Bulma vs Ring UI

Overview

Bulma

Stacks780

Followers855

Votes38

GitHub Stars50.0K

Forks3.9K

Ring UI

Stacks41

Followers85

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.7K

Forks198

Bulma vs Ring UI: What are the differences?

Framework Compatibility: Ring UI is specifically designed to work with React whereas Bulma is a CSS framework that can be used with any front-end technology.
Component Library: Ring UI provides a comprehensive set of UI components tailored for React applications, while Bulma focuses mainly on CSS styling without providing pre-built components.
Theming and Customization: Bulma allows for easy customization and theming through variables and modifiers, while Ring UI may require more effort in theming and customizing components.
Documentation and Support: Bulma has extensive documentation and a large community for support, whereas Ring UI, being a more specialized framework, may have limited resources available.
Community Adoption: Bulma has a wide user base and is a popular choice for many developers, while Ring UI may not have the same level of adoption due to its specific compatibility with React.
Learning Curve: Bulma, with its simplicity and ease of use, has a lower learning curve for beginners compared to Ring UI, which may require familiarity with React concepts.

In Summary, Bulma offers a versatile CSS framework with a wide range of customization options and community support, while Ring UI is tailored for React applications with a focus on providing a component library for building UI interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bulma, Ring UI

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bulma	Ring UI
Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass	An open-source library for web-based products. At JetBrains, we use Ring UI components for our web-based products like YouTrack, Hub, TeamCity, and Upsource.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 50.0K	GitHub Stars 3.7K
GitHub Forks 3.9K	GitHub Forks 198
Stacks 780	Stacks 41
Followers 855	Followers 85
Votes 38	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Easy setup 6 Easy-to-customize the sass build 6 Community-created themes 5 Great docs 5 Responsive Cons 2 Not yet supporting Vue 3	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	React

What are some alternatives to Bulma, Ring UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bulma vs Ring UI: What are the differences?

Framework Compatibility: Ring UI is specifically designed to work with React whereas Bulma is a CSS framework that can be used with any front-end technology.
Component Library: Ring UI provides a comprehensive set of UI components tailored for React applications, while Bulma focuses mainly on CSS styling without providing pre-built components.
Theming and Customization: Bulma allows for easy customization and theming through variables and modifiers, while Ring UI may require more effort in theming and customizing components.
Documentation and Support: Bulma has extensive documentation and a large community for support, whereas Ring UI, being a more specialized framework, may have limited resources available.
Community Adoption: Bulma has a wide user base and is a popular choice for many developers, while Ring UI may not have the same level of adoption due to its specific compatibility with React.
Learning Curve: Bulma, with its simplicity and ease of use, has a lower learning curve for beginners compared to Ring UI, which may require familiarity with React concepts.

Bulma vs Ring UI

Overview