StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Uploads
  5. Bytescale vs jQuery File Upload

Bytescale vs jQuery File Upload

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bytescale
Bytescale
Stacks12
Followers19
Votes21
jQuery File Upload
jQuery File Upload
Stacks5
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars30.9K
Forks7.9K

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bytescale
Bytescale
jQuery File Upload
jQuery File Upload

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

It is a File Upload widget with multiple file selection, drag&drop support, progress bar, validation and preview images, audio and video for jQuery. Supports cross-domain, chunked and resumable file uploads. Works with any server-side platform (Google App Engine, PHP, Python, Ruby on Rails, Java, etc.) that supports standard HTML form file uploads.

Image Processing APIs; Video Processing APIs; Audio Processing APIs; Fast CDN; Permanent Cache Layer; CDN Mode (Process External Files via HTTP); External Storage Support (S3, R2, GCP, DigitalOcean); Beautiful dashboard and charts; REST APIs; Lightweight JavaScript SDK; File Upload Widget; Custom domain (CNAME) support; Authenticated URLs
Allows to select multiple files at once and upload them simultaneously Allows to upload files by dragging them from your desktop or file manager and dropping them on your browser window; Shows a progress bar indicating the upload progress for individual files and for all uploads combined; Individual file uploads can be canceled to stop the upload progress
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
30.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.9K
Stacks
12
Stacks
5
Followers
19
Followers
5
Votes
21
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    CDN Included
  • 3
    Lightweight JS SDK
  • 2
    No branding
  • 2
    Serverless
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Vue.js
Vue.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
React
React
jQuery
jQuery
Angular
Angular
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bytescale, jQuery File Upload?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Uppy

Uppy

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

Filestack

Filestack

Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.

CarrierWave

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

FilePond

FilePond

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

Shrine

Shrine

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

tus.io

tus.io

Open protocol for resumable file uploads

CameraTag

CameraTag

With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase