StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. C# vs UIkIt

C# vs UIkIt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C#
C#
Stacks70.1K
Followers46.3K
Votes2.2K
UIkIt
UIkIt
Stacks791
Followers417
Votes262
GitHub Stars18.5K
Forks2.3K

C# vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between C# and UIkIt. C# is a programming language created by Microsoft, while UIkIt is a front-end framework used for building responsive websites. Understanding the differences between these two can help developers decide which tool is more suitable for their web development projects.

  1. Syntax and Structure: C# is a fully-fledged object-oriented programming language with a strict syntax and structure. It follows the C-style syntax and requires the use of brackets and semicolons. On the other hand, UIkIt is based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, so it follows a markup-like syntax and structure. It allows developers to use classes and attributes to style and structure their web pages.

  2. Purpose: C# is primarily used as a backend programming language for building web applications, desktop applications, and other software solutions. It is commonly used with the .NET framework. UIkIt, on the other hand, is a front-end framework designed specifically for creating responsive and mobile-first websites. It provides a set of pre-built components and styles that can be easily integrated into web pages.

  3. Integration with Other Technologies: C# can be seamlessly integrated with other Microsoft technologies such as ASP.NET, WPF, and Xamarin. It can also work well with various databases and third-party libraries. UIkIt, on the other hand, can be used with any backend technology or CMS as it is primarily focused on the front-end. It can be easily integrated with popular CMS platforms like WordPress and Joomla.

  4. Learning Curve: C# is a powerful programming language that requires a deep understanding of object-oriented concepts, data types, and algorithmic thinking. It may take some time for beginners to master C# and become proficient in coding. On the contrary, UIkIt is relatively easy to learn and use. It provides a simplified way of building responsive websites without requiring extensive programming knowledge.

  5. Community and Support: C# has a large and active community of developers who constantly contribute to its development. It has extensive documentation, online forums, and resources available for developers to seek help and support. UIkIt also has a growing community of users, but it may not be as large as the C# community. However, UIkIt has its own support channels, documentation, and user forums to assist developers.

  6. Scope of Use: C# can be used for a wide range of projects, including web applications, game development, desktop software, and mobile apps. It is a versatile language that can handle complex tasks and applications. On the other hand, UIkIt is specifically designed for front-end web development. It focuses on creating interactive and responsive user interfaces for websites.

In summary, C# is a powerful and versatile programming language used for backend development, while UIkIt is a front-end framework focused on creating responsive websites. C# requires a deeper understanding of programming concepts, while UIkIt provides a simpler way of building web interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C#, UIkIt

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

447k views447k
Comments
Erik
Erik

Chief Architect at LiveTiles

May 18, 2020

Decided

C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.

614k views614k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C#
C#
UIkIt
UIkIt

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

-
LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
18.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
70.1K
Stacks
791
Followers
46.3K
Followers
417
Votes
2.2K
Votes
262
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 351
    Cool syntax
  • 294
    Great lambda support
  • 267
    Great generics support
  • 212
    Language integrated query (linq)
  • 181
    Extension methods
Cons
  • 15
    Poor x-platform GUI support
  • 8
    Closed source
  • 7
    Fast and secure
  • 7
    Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma
Pros
  • 39
    Complete GUI
  • 29
    Easy modify
  • 27
    Practical
  • 24
    Functional
  • 24
    Easy to learn
Integrations
.NET
.NET
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to C#, UIkIt?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase