Capistrano vs Strider

Capistrano vs Strider: What are the differences?

Developers describe Capistrano as "A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby". Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows. On the other hand, Strider is detailed as "*Open-Source Continuous Integration and Deployment Server *". Strider is an Open Source Continuous Deployment / Continuous Integration platform. It is written in Node.JS / JavaScript and uses MongoDB as a backing store. It is published under the BSD license.

Capistrano can be classified as a tool in the "Server Configuration and Automation" category, while Strider is grouped under "Continuous Integration".

Some of the features offered by Capistrano are:

• Reliably deploy web application to any number of machines simultaneously, in sequence or as a rolling set
• Automate audits of any number of machines (checking login logs, enumerating uptimes, and/or applying security patches)
• Script arbitrary workflows over SSH

On the other hand, Strider provides the following key features:

• add hooks to perform arbitrary actions during build.
• modify the database schema to add custom fields.
• register their own HTTP routes.

"Automated deployment with several custom recipes" is the primary reason why developers consider Capistrano over the competitors, whereas "Free Open Source" was stated as the key factor in picking Strider.

Capistrano and Strider are both open source tools. It seems that Capistrano with 11.1K GitHub stars and 1.71K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Strider with 4.33K GitHub stars and 435 GitHub forks.