StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Casbin vs Devise

Casbin vs Devise

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
Casbin
Casbin
Stacks39
Followers78
Votes0
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks1.7K

Casbin vs Devise: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Here are the key differences between Casbin and Devise:

1. **Authorization Model**: Casbin uses a flexible access control model that can be used for various purposes, while Devise is specifically designed for authentication and user management.

2. **Policy Management**: Casbin allows users to define policies in a central location using a policy file or API, providing more control and convenience. In contrast, Devise relies on predefined mechanisms for user authentication and session management.

3. **Multi-Language Support**: Casbin supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for a variety of applications, whereas Devise is primarily used with Ruby on Rails applications.

4. **Fine-Grained Control**: Casbin offers fine-grained access control capabilities down to the level of individual API endpoints or data fields, giving users more control over their authorization rules. Devise, on the other hand, focuses more on higher-level user authentication and session management.

5. **Community Support**: Casbin has a growing community with active development and support, providing users with ongoing updates and new features. Devise also has an active community but is more focused on Ruby on Rails development.

6. **Integration Capabilities**: Casbin can be easily integrated with various frameworks and platforms, allowing for seamless integration into different applications. Devise, being more Rails-specific, may require more customization for integration with other frameworks or systems.

# Summary
In Summary, Casbin offers a robust and flexible access control model with fine-grained control and multi-language support, while Devise is tailored more towards authentication and user management within Ruby on Rails applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
Casbin
Casbin

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

In Casbin, an access control model is abstracted into a CONF file based on the PERM metamodel (Policy, Effect, Request, Matchers). So switching or upgrading the authorization mechanism for a project is just as simple as modifying a configuration. You can customize your own access control model by combining the available models.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
535
Stacks
39
Followers
232
Followers
78
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rails
Rails
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Devise, Casbin?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope