Castle vs Checkmarx

Overview

Castle

Stacks47

Followers62

Votes0

Checkmarx

Stacks84

Followers135

Votes0

Castle vs Checkmarx: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between Castle and Checkmarx in a concise manner.

1. **Pricing Model**: Castle offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing customers to pay only for what they use. On the other hand, Checkmarx follows a subscription-based pricing model where customers pay a fixed fee for a set period.
   
2. **Product Focus**: Castle primarily focuses on providing comprehensive online security solutions such as bot mitigation, client-side security, and API security. In contrast, Checkmarx specializes in application security testing tools, including static application security testing (SAST) and interactive application security testing (IAST).
   
3. **Deployment Options**: Castle offers both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options to cater to different customer preferences. In contrast, Checkmarx primarily offers a cloud-based deployment model, enabling customers to access their services remotely.
   
4. **Integration Capabilities**: Castle provides integrations with various third-party services and platforms, allowing customers to seamlessly incorporate their security solutions into their existing workflows. Checkmarx offers integrations with popular development tools, enabling seamless integration with the software development lifecycle.
   
5. **Scalability**: Castle is known for its ability to scale rapidly to accommodate growing customer needs and traffic spikes effectively. While Checkmarx also offers scalability, it may require additional configurations or resources to handle sudden increases in workload.
   
6. **Reporting and Analytics**: Castle emphasizes detailed reporting and analytics capabilities to provide customers with insights into their security posture and potential threats. In comparison, Checkmarx offers robust reporting features tailored specifically for application security testing purposes.

In Summary, the key differences between Castle and Checkmarx encompass their pricing models, product focus, deployment options, integration capabilities, scalability, and reporting and analytics features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Castle	Checkmarx
Castle looks for suspicious login patterns without bothering the legitimate user nor the site administrator. The fully-automated anti-hijack engine identifies potential account compromises based on where the user logs in from and how they navigate the site.	It is a provider of state-of-the-art application security solution: static code analysis software, seamlessly integrated into development process.
Security Analytics; Threat Alerts; Login Notification Emails; Threat Segments; Adaptive Authentication	Evaluate Your Exposure with a Holistic Platform; Gain Full Visibility; Secure Your Entire SDLC; Empower Your Developers; Determine Your Acceptable Risk
Statistics
Stacks 47	Stacks 84
Followers 62	Followers 135
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Jenkins Gradle Bitbucket Travis CI TeamCity Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Castle, Checkmarx?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Castle vs Checkmarx: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between Castle and Checkmarx in a concise manner.

1. **Pricing Model**: Castle offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing customers to pay only for what they use. On the other hand, Checkmarx follows a subscription-based pricing model where customers pay a fixed fee for a set period.
   
2. **Product Focus**: Castle primarily focuses on providing comprehensive online security solutions such as bot mitigation, client-side security, and API security. In contrast, Checkmarx specializes in application security testing tools, including static application security testing (SAST) and interactive application security testing (IAST).
   
3. **Deployment Options**: Castle offers both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options to cater to different customer preferences. In contrast, Checkmarx primarily offers a cloud-based deployment model, enabling customers to access their services remotely.
   
4. **Integration Capabilities**: Castle provides integrations with various third-party services and platforms, allowing customers to seamlessly incorporate their security solutions into their existing workflows. Checkmarx offers integrations with popular development tools, enabling seamless integration with the software development lifecycle.
   
5. **Scalability**: Castle is known for its ability to scale rapidly to accommodate growing customer needs and traffic spikes effectively. While Checkmarx also offers scalability, it may require additional configurations or resources to handle sudden increases in workload.
   
6. **Reporting and Analytics**: Castle emphasizes detailed reporting and analytics capabilities to provide customers with insights into their security posture and potential threats. In comparison, Checkmarx offers robust reporting features tailored specifically for application security testing purposes.

Castle vs Checkmarx

Overview