StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Castle Windsor vs Kind

Castle Windsor vs Kind

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Castle Windsor
Castle Windsor
Stacks56
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks458
Kind
Kind
Stacks26
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.7K
Forks1.7K

Castle Windsor vs Kind: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Castle Windsor and Kind, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two dependency injection frameworks.

1. Inversion of Control Container: Castle Windsor uses an Inversion of Control (IoC) container that allows developers to manage the lifecycle and dependencies of their components, while Kind utilizes a lightweight IoC container that focuses on simplicity and ease of use.

2. Configuration: Castle Windsor relies heavily on XML or fluent API configuration for setting up component registrations and dependencies, whereas Kind prefers a more modern approach using attributes and conventions for configuration, reducing the need for extensive XML configuration files.

3. Extensibility: Castle Windsor offers a high level of extensibility through its plugin architecture, allowing developers to create custom extensions and behaviors, whereas Kind provides a more restricted set of extension points, focusing on simplicity and ease of use over configurability.

4. Performance: Castle Windsor is known for its powerful features and flexibility, but this can come at the cost of performance, as it may introduce overhead due to its extensive feature set. On the other hand, Kind prioritizes speed and efficiency, aiming for minimal overhead and faster execution times.

5. Community and Support: Castle Windsor has a larger and more established community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and active support forums, making it easier for developers to find help and resources. Kind, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community and less mature support infrastructure, which could impact the availability of assistance and resources.

6. Learning Curve: Castle Windsor, being a feature-rich and powerful framework, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its complexity and extensive feature set, while Kind's simpler and more straightforward approach makes it easier for developers to quickly grasp and start using the framework.

In Summary, Castle Windsor and Kind differ in their approach to IoC containers, configuration methods, extensibility, performance, community support, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Castle Windsor
Castle Windsor
Kind
Kind

It can give you objects with pre-built and pre-wired dependencies right in there. An entire object graph created via reflection and configuration rather than the "new" operator.

It is a tool for running local Kubernetes clusters using Docker container “nodes”. It was primarily designed for testing Kubernetes itself, but may be used for local development or CI.

Inversion of Control container; Available for .NET
Supports multi-node (including HA) clusters; Supports building Kubernetes release builds from source; Support for make / bash / docker, or bazel, in addition to pre-published builds; Supports Linux, macOS and Windows; It is a CNCF certified conformant Kubernetes installer
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
14.7K
GitHub Forks
458
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
56
Stacks
26
Followers
10
Followers
59
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Bazel
Bazel

What are some alternatives to Castle Windsor, Kind?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana