StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Charles vs Fiddler

Charles vs Fiddler

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Charles
Charles
Stacks142
Followers167
Votes0
Fiddler
Fiddler
Stacks113
Followers123
Votes0

Charles vs Fiddler: What are the differences?

Charles and Fiddler are popular web debugging proxy tools that allow developers to analyze and intercept HTTP and HTTPS traffic. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Installation and System Compatibility: Charles is compatible with macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems. It requires installation and can be easily downloaded from the official website. Fiddler, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows operating systems and is only available for installation on those platforms.

  2. Interface and User Experience: Charles has a user-friendly and intuitive interface, featuring a clear layout and easily accessible tools and features. It provides a smooth experience for users, making it easier to analyze and debug web traffic. Fiddler has a more complex interface compared to Charles, with a wide range of features and customizable options. While it offers more advanced functionalities, beginners might find it overwhelming initially.

  3. SSL Proxying and SSL Certificates: Charles has built-in SSL proxying capabilities, allowing users to intercept and inspect HTTPS traffic. It generates and installs SSL certificates automatically, simplifying the setup process. Fiddler also supports SSL proxying but requires additional manual configuration to intercept HTTPS traffic. Users need to generate and install SSL certificates manually, which can require more technical knowledge.

  4. Platform Support and Plug-ins: Charles has limited support for plug-ins and extensions. It does not have an official plug-in ecosystem, but some third-party extensions are available. However, it provides comprehensive support for various platforms and mobile devices. Fiddler offers an extensive plug-in ecosystem, allowing developers to enhance its functionality with a wide range of community-developed extensions. It provides more flexibility and customization options through these plug-ins.

  5. Performance and Resource Usage: Charles is known for its efficient performance, requiring relatively low system resources and providing quick response times. It can handle a large amount of traffic without significant impact on system performance. Fiddler, due to its extensive features and functionalities, can consume more system resources compared to Charles. While it can handle heavy traffic, it may slow down the overall performance of the system.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Charles is a commercial tool that requires a paid license to use its full features. It offers a free trial period, allowing users to evaluate the software before making a purchase. Fiddler is a free and open-source tool, available for both personal and commercial use. It offers all its features without any limitations or the need for a paid license.

In summary, Charles, known for its user-friendly interface and robust features, is widely used for inspecting HTTP and SSL/HTTPS traffic. Fiddler, with its extensive capabilities and scripting support, is a popular choice for developers and testers, providing detailed insights into HTTP/HTTPS communication.

Detailed Comparison

Charles
Charles
Fiddler
Fiddler

Charles is a web proxy (HTTP Proxy / HTTP Monitor) that runs on your own computer. Your web browser (or any other Internet application) is then configured to access the Internet through Charles, and Charles is then able to record and display for you all of the data that is sent and received.

It is a free web debugging proxy for any browser, system or platform. It helps you debug web applications by capturing network traffic between the Internet and test computers. The tool enables you to inspect incoming and outgoing data to monitor and modify requests and responses before the browser receives them.

SSL Proxying – view SSL requests and responses in plain text;Bandwidth Throttling to simulate slower Internet connections including latency;AJAX debugging – view XML and JSON requests and responses as a tree or as text;AMF – view the contents of Flash Remoting / Flex Remoting messages as a tree;Repeat requests to test back-end changes;Edit requests to test different inputs;Breakpoints to intercept and edit requests or responses;Validate recorded HTML, CSS and RSS/atom responses using the W3C validator
-
Statistics
Stacks
142
Stacks
113
Followers
167
Followers
123
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Charles, Fiddler?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope