Checkmarx vs ClusterFuzz

Overview

Checkmarx

Stacks84

Followers135

Votes0

ClusterFuzz

Stacks0

Followers6

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.5K

Forks588

Checkmarx vs ClusterFuzz: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Checkmarx and ClusterFuzz, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two security testing tools.

Testing Approach: Checkmarx is a static application security testing (SAST) tool that analyzes the source code for vulnerabilities before the application is compiled and run. On the other hand, ClusterFuzz is a dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool that tests the application by executing it and identifying vulnerabilities during runtime.
Automation Level: Checkmarx offers automated code analysis with options for manual code reviews. In contrast, ClusterFuzz provides fully automated bug detection and reporting without manual intervention, making it suitable for continuous integration and deployment environments.
Integration Capabilities: Checkmarx integrates with various development tools, such as IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, to enable seamless testing within the development workflow. ClusterFuzz integrates with open-source and custom tools but might require additional configuration for specific environments.
Vulnerability Detection: Checkmarx focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in the source code, including OWASP top 10 issues, while ClusterFuzz is more specialized in detecting security vulnerabilities related to memory corruption and other specific types of bugs.
Scalability: Checkmarx is typically used for smaller to medium-sized applications, offering detailed analysis of code vulnerabilities. In contrast, ClusterFuzz is designed for larger-scale applications and can handle a high volume of tests and bug reports efficiently.
Cost Considerations: Checkmarx is a commercial tool with licensing fees based on the number of users and features required, making it more suitable for organizations with budget allocation for security testing tools. On the other hand, ClusterFuzz is an open-source tool that can be customized and scaled without additional costs, making it more accessible for developers with limited resources.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Checkmarx and ClusterFuzz can help organizations choose the right tool based on their security testing requirements and development environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkmarx	ClusterFuzz
It is a provider of state-of-the-art application security solution: static code analysis software, seamlessly integrated into development process.	ClusterFuzz is a scalable fuzzing infrastructure which finds security and stability issues in software. It is used by Google for fuzzing the Chrome Browser, and serves as the fuzzing backend for OSS-Fuzz.
Evaluate Your Exposure with a Holistic Platform; Gain Full Visibility; Secure Your Entire SDLC; Empower Your Developers; Determine Your Acceptable Risk	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 588
Stacks 84	Stacks 0
Followers 135	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Jenkins Gradle Bitbucket Travis CI TeamCity Bamboo	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Checkmarx, ClusterFuzz?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Checkmarx vs ClusterFuzz: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Checkmarx and ClusterFuzz, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two security testing tools.

Testing Approach: Checkmarx is a static application security testing (SAST) tool that analyzes the source code for vulnerabilities before the application is compiled and run. On the other hand, ClusterFuzz is a dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool that tests the application by executing it and identifying vulnerabilities during runtime.
Automation Level: Checkmarx offers automated code analysis with options for manual code reviews. In contrast, ClusterFuzz provides fully automated bug detection and reporting without manual intervention, making it suitable for continuous integration and deployment environments.
Integration Capabilities: Checkmarx integrates with various development tools, such as IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, to enable seamless testing within the development workflow. ClusterFuzz integrates with open-source and custom tools but might require additional configuration for specific environments.
Vulnerability Detection: Checkmarx focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in the source code, including OWASP top 10 issues, while ClusterFuzz is more specialized in detecting security vulnerabilities related to memory corruption and other specific types of bugs.
Scalability: Checkmarx is typically used for smaller to medium-sized applications, offering detailed analysis of code vulnerabilities. In contrast, ClusterFuzz is designed for larger-scale applications and can handle a high volume of tests and bug reports efficiently.
Cost Considerations: Checkmarx is a commercial tool with licensing fees based on the number of users and features required, making it more suitable for organizations with budget allocation for security testing tools. On the other hand, ClusterFuzz is an open-source tool that can be customized and scaled without additional costs, making it more accessible for developers with limited resources.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Checkmarx and ClusterFuzz can help organizations choose the right tool based on their security testing requirements and development environment.