Chronosphere vs Jaeger: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Chronosphere and Jaeger are both open-source distributed tracing platforms used to monitor and troubleshoot microservices-based applications.

1. **Data Storage**: Chronosphere uses a native Time Series Platform for storing trace data, while Jaeger uses a pluggable storage backend allowing users to choose their preferred storage solution.
2. **Data Sampling**: Chronosphere offers various sampling techniques like head-based, tail-based, etc., whereas Jaeger primarily focuses on head-based sampling.
3. **Querying Capabilities**: Chronosphere provides advanced querying capabilities like filtering by service, operation, tags, and exporting traces to CSV, while Jaeger offers filtering by service and operation with limited export options.
4. **Metrics Integration**: Chronosphere integrates seamlessly with Prometheus for metrics monitoring, while Jaeger has the ability to ingest metrics but with less comprehensive integration features.
5. **User Interface**: Chronosphere offers a modern, user-friendly interface with enhanced visualization options, whereas Jaeger provides a simpler interface with basic visualization features.
6. **Community Support**: Chronosphere has a smaller but dedicated community providing support and frequent updates, while Jaeger boasts a larger community with extensive documentation and resources.

In Summary, Chronosphere and Jaeger differ in terms of data storage, sampling techniques, querying capabilities, metrics integration, user interface, and community support.