StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Clickhouse vs YugabyteDB

Clickhouse vs YugabyteDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Clickhouse
Clickhouse
Stacks433
Followers543
Votes85
YugabyteDB
YugabyteDB
Stacks50
Followers114
Votes1
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks1.2K

Clickhouse vs YugabyteDB: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ClickHouse and YugabyteDB

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between ClickHouse and YugabyteDB, two popular database management systems.

  1. Architecture: ClickHouse is a columnar database designed for analytical workloads, while YugabyteDB is a distributed SQL database that supports both analytical and transactional workloads. ClickHouse's architecture focuses on high-performance analytics with a focus on read-heavy workloads, whereas YugabyteDB's architecture is designed for global data distribution and high availability across multiple regions.

  2. Data Model: ClickHouse follows a table-based data model, where data is organized into tables and columns. It supports structured and semi-structured data formats, such as JSON and XML. On the other hand, YugabyteDB uses a distributed key-value store with support for structured and relational data. It offers a flexible schema design with support for JSON and other data formats.

  3. Consistency Model: ClickHouse sacrifices some level of consistency for high performance. It follows an eventually consistent model, where data replication and synchronization may take some time. YugabyteDB, on the other hand, provides strong consistency guarantees by default. It ensures that all read and write operations are immediately consistent across all replicas.

  4. Scaling: ClickHouse offers horizontal scaling by splitting data across multiple shards and replicas. It supports automatic data distribution and replication for high availability. YugabyteDB also provides horizontal scaling by distributing data across multiple nodes and regions. It leverages distributed consensus protocols to ensure fault tolerance and scalability.

  5. SQL Compatibility: ClickHouse supports a subset of SQL with some proprietary extensions. It provides a wide range of analytical functions and SQL constructs suitable for analytical workloads. YugabyteDB, on the other hand, aims to provide full SQL compatibility and supports features like distributed transactions, secondary indexes, and joins, making it suitable for both analytical and OLTP workloads.

  6. Ecosystem Integration: ClickHouse has a mature ecosystem with various connectors and integrations with popular tools like Apache Kafka, Apache Spark, and more. It also provides built-in support for data ingestion and export in various formats. YugabyteDB is compatible with PostgreSQL, enabling easy integration with existing PostgreSQL tools, applications, and libraries. It also offers native integrations with popular databases like Elasticsearch and Apache Cassandra.

In summary, ClickHouse is a columnar analytics database with a strong focus on high-performance analytical workloads, while YugabyteDB is a distributed SQL database that supports both analytical and transactional workloads with strong consistency guarantees and PostgreSQL compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Clickhouse
Clickhouse
YugabyteDB
YugabyteDB

It allows analysis of data that is updated in real time. It offers instant results in most cases: the data is processed faster than it takes to create a query.

An open-source, high-performance, distributed SQL database built for resilience and scale. Re-uses the upper half of PostgreSQL to offer advanced RDBMS features, architected to be fully distributed like Google Spanner.

-
Resilience; High Performance; Scalability; Enterprise Grade; Cloud-native; Kubernetes; PostgreSQL-compatible; Geo-Distributed; Hybrid Cloud
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
433
Stacks
50
Followers
543
Followers
114
Votes
85
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Fast, very very fast
  • 11
    Good compression ratio
  • 7
    Horizontally scalable
  • 6
    Utilizes all CPU resources
  • 5
    Open-source
Cons
  • 5
    Slow insert operations
Pros
  • 1
    Compatible with the result of pg_dump
Integrations
No integrations available
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Java
Java
Python
Python
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Node.js
Node.js
C#
C#
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Clickhouse, YugabyteDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase