CodeceptJS vs SuperTest

Overview

SuperTest

Stacks1.9K

Followers102

Votes0

CodeceptJS

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes52

CodeceptJS vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing CodeceptJS and SuperTest, both tools are commonly used for testing web applications. However, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of usage and functionality.

Framework vs Library: CodeceptJS is a testing framework that provides a structured way to organize and run tests, whereas SuperTest is a library that offers utilities to make HTTP requests and assertions on the responses.
Programming Paradigm: CodeceptJS is focused on the implementation of the Page Object Model pattern, which emphasizes the separation of test logic from UI logic for better test maintenance, while SuperTest is more conventional in its use of writing test cases directly within the test files.
Asynchronous Testing: CodeceptJS comes with built-in support for writing asynchronous tests using the async/await syntax, making it easier to handle asynchronous operations in tests, while SuperTest requires additional implementations or libraries for handling asynchronous testing.
Automation Testing: CodeceptJS is designed for end-to-end automation testing and supports various automation drivers, such as Puppeteer and WebDriver, enabling cross-browser testing, whereas SuperTest is primarily focused on API testing and does not provide built-in support for browser automation.
Test Reporting: CodeceptJS includes built-in test reporting features with detailed reports and logs, making it easier to track test results and failures, while SuperTest requires the integration of separate test reporting tools or libraries for generating test reports.
Community Support: CodeceptJS has a larger and more active community, providing resources, plugins, and support for users, while SuperTest, being a smaller library, may have limited resources and community-driven developments available.

In Summary, CodeceptJS and SuperTest differ in terms of their approach to testing, asynchronous testing support, automation capabilities, test reporting features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SuperTest	CodeceptJS
It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.	It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.
HTTP assertions;Asynchronous;Promise support	Behavior Driven Development; Acceptance Testing; Data Driven Tests
Statistics
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 117
Followers 102	Followers 217
Votes 0	Votes 52
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 10 Readability 9 Full browser control 9 Cross browser support 8 Open source 6 Community Cons 2 Small community 1 Not a framework by itself
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript SilverStripe Wallaby.js MockIt (open source) Glamorous Majestic GUI

What are some alternatives to SuperTest, CodeceptJS?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

CodeceptJS vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing CodeceptJS and SuperTest, both tools are commonly used for testing web applications. However, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of usage and functionality.

Framework vs Library: CodeceptJS is a testing framework that provides a structured way to organize and run tests, whereas SuperTest is a library that offers utilities to make HTTP requests and assertions on the responses.
Programming Paradigm: CodeceptJS is focused on the implementation of the Page Object Model pattern, which emphasizes the separation of test logic from UI logic for better test maintenance, while SuperTest is more conventional in its use of writing test cases directly within the test files.
Asynchronous Testing: CodeceptJS comes with built-in support for writing asynchronous tests using the async/await syntax, making it easier to handle asynchronous operations in tests, while SuperTest requires additional implementations or libraries for handling asynchronous testing.
Automation Testing: CodeceptJS is designed for end-to-end automation testing and supports various automation drivers, such as Puppeteer and WebDriver, enabling cross-browser testing, whereas SuperTest is primarily focused on API testing and does not provide built-in support for browser automation.
Test Reporting: CodeceptJS includes built-in test reporting features with detailed reports and logs, making it easier to track test results and failures, while SuperTest requires the integration of separate test reporting tools or libraries for generating test reports.
Community Support: CodeceptJS has a larger and more active community, providing resources, plugins, and support for users, while SuperTest, being a smaller library, may have limited resources and community-driven developments available.

In Summary, CodeceptJS and SuperTest differ in terms of their approach to testing, asynchronous testing support, automation capabilities, test reporting features, and community support.