StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. CodeFactor.io vs GitHub Enterprise

CodeFactor.io vs GitHub Enterprise

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
CodeFactor.io
CodeFactor.io
Stacks48
Followers83
Votes31

CodeFactor.io vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Introduction:
In comparing CodeFactor.io and GitHub Enterprise, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two platforms to make an informed decision for software development projects.

  1. Pricing Model: CodeFactor.io offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay according to the number of repositories and team members. On the other hand, GitHub Enterprise requires a flat fee based on the number of users, regardless of the number of repositories, making it a more cost-effective option for larger organizations with many repositories.

  2. Features and Integration: CodeFactor.io primarily focuses on providing automated code review and analysis tools to improve code quality. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise offers a wider range of features, including version control, issue tracking, collaboration tools, and integration with various third-party services, making it a comprehensive platform for software development.

  3. Deployment Options: CodeFactor.io is a cloud-based platform, meaning all data and processes are managed remotely, and users rely on the internet connection for access. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, giving organizations more flexibility and control over their data and security protocols.

  4. Scalability and Support: GitHub Enterprise is known for its scalability, able to accommodate large enterprises with high traffic and storage requirements. This platform also provides dedicated customer support to assist users with any technical issues or customization needs, while CodeFactor.io may have limited support options for complex setups.

  5. Security and Compliance: GitHub Enterprise offers advanced security features, including encryption, access control, and compliance certifications, making it a more suitable choice for organizations with stringent security requirements or handling sensitive data. CodeFactor.io may have fewer security measures in place, making it less ideal for highly regulated industries.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: GitHub Enterprise benefits from a vast user community and ecosystem, offering access to a wide range of open-source projects, libraries, and collaboration opportunities. This extensive network can provide valuable resources, insights, and collaboration possibilities that may be limited on CodeFactor.io.

In Summary, the key differences between CodeFactor.io and GitHub Enterprise encompass their pricing models, features, deployment options, scalability, security measures, and community ecosystems, ultimately influencing the suitability of each platform for different software development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
CodeFactor.io
CodeFactor.io

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Integrates with GitHub or BitBucket in seconds - nothing to install. Solo to Team - unlimited users for every repository. Continuously tracks code quality with every commit and pull request. Recognizes libraries in use and identifies potential code issues within. Checks complexity, duplication, churn, problems for code style, performance, etc; Provides real-time actionable feedback about potential quality issues as soon as they occur. Identifies hot-spots the most impactful list for refactoring. Private and Secure - encryption in transit and at rest. Free for Open Source and full time Students. Discount for non-profits.
Statistics
Stacks
500
Stacks
48
Followers
627
Followers
83
Votes
10
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Pros
  • 8
    Easy setup & GitHub integration
  • 7
    Github integration
  • 5
    Free for open source
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Helps reduce technical debt
Integrations
No integrations available
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, CodeFactor.io?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana