CodeFactor.io vs uberalls

Overview

uberalls

Stacks36

Followers62

Votes0

GitHub Stars186

Forks14

CodeFactor.io

Stacks48

Followers83

Votes31

CodeFactor.io vs uberalls: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: CodeFactor.io offers a free tier for open-source projects with limited functionality, while uberalls only offers paid plans starting at a higher price point for all users. CodeFactor.io charges based on the number of repositories analyzed, while uberalls has a flat monthly fee regardless of the number of repositories.
Supported Integrations: CodeFactor.io integrates with popular code hosting platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing seamless integration with existing workflows. In contrast, uberalls offers integration with a more limited set of platforms, potentially restricting its usability for certain teams.
Customization Options: CodeFactor.io allows users to customize the analysis settings and define their own quality gates to tailor the tool to specific project needs. uberalls, on the other hand, has predefined metrics and rules with less flexibility for customization.
Feedback Mechanism: CodeFactor.io provides detailed feedback on code quality issues with actionable insights and suggestions for improvement, facilitating better code maintenance. uberalls may offer more generic feedback without as much depth or specificity.
Scalability: CodeFactor.io is designed to scale with growing projects and offers features that cater to larger organizations with complex codebases. uberalls may lack certain scalability features that could be essential for extensive projects or enterprises.
Community Support: CodeFactor.io has a larger community of users and contributors, allowing for a more active exchange of ideas, best practices, and support within the community. uberalls may have a smaller user base, resulting in limited community support and resources.

In Summary, CodeFactor.io and uberalls differ in their pricing model, supported integrations, customization options, feedback mechanism, scalability, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

uberalls	CodeFactor.io
Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.	CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.
-	Integrates with GitHub or BitBucket in seconds - nothing to install. Solo to Team - unlimited users for every repository. Continuously tracks code quality with every commit and pull request. Recognizes libraries in use and identifies potential code issues within. Checks complexity, duplication, churn, problems for code style, performance, etc; Provides real-time actionable feedback about potential quality issues as soon as they occur. Identifies hot-spots the most impactful list for refactoring. Private and Secure - encryption in transit and at rest. Free for Open Source and full time Students. Discount for non-profits.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 186	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 14	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 36	Stacks 48
Followers 62	Followers 83
Votes 0	Votes 31
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 8 Easy setup & GitHub integration 7 Github integration 5 Easy setup 5 Free for open source 3 Helps reduce technical debt
Integrations
Jenkins Phabricator	Slack GitHub Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to uberalls, CodeFactor.io?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Codecov

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Coveralls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Related Comparisons

CodeFactor.io vs uberalls: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: CodeFactor.io offers a free tier for open-source projects with limited functionality, while uberalls only offers paid plans starting at a higher price point for all users. CodeFactor.io charges based on the number of repositories analyzed, while uberalls has a flat monthly fee regardless of the number of repositories.
Supported Integrations: CodeFactor.io integrates with popular code hosting platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing seamless integration with existing workflows. In contrast, uberalls offers integration with a more limited set of platforms, potentially restricting its usability for certain teams.
Customization Options: CodeFactor.io allows users to customize the analysis settings and define their own quality gates to tailor the tool to specific project needs. uberalls, on the other hand, has predefined metrics and rules with less flexibility for customization.
Feedback Mechanism: CodeFactor.io provides detailed feedback on code quality issues with actionable insights and suggestions for improvement, facilitating better code maintenance. uberalls may offer more generic feedback without as much depth or specificity.
Scalability: CodeFactor.io is designed to scale with growing projects and offers features that cater to larger organizations with complex codebases. uberalls may lack certain scalability features that could be essential for extensive projects or enterprises.
Community Support: CodeFactor.io has a larger community of users and contributors, allowing for a more active exchange of ideas, best practices, and support within the community. uberalls may have a smaller user base, resulting in limited community support and resources.

In Summary, CodeFactor.io and uberalls differ in their pricing model, supported integrations, customization options, feedback mechanism, scalability, and community support.

CodeFactor.io vs uberalls

Overview