StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Mobile UI Frameworks
  5. ComponentKit vs Render

ComponentKit vs Render

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ComponentKit
ComponentKit
Stacks14
Followers28
Votes5
GitHub Stars5.8K
Forks582
CoreRender
CoreRender
Stacks56
Followers55
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks96

ComponentKit vs Render: What are the differences?

1. **UI Components**: ComponentKit focuses on dividing the UI into small, reusable components that are declaratively defined, allowing for easier reusability and maintenance. Render, on the other hand, takes a more imperative approach, focusing on building UI elements programmatically. 2. **Performance**: ComponentKit prioritizes performance by utilizing data diffing algorithms to efficiently update the UI based on changes. Render, on the other hand, does not have built-in data diffing algorithms which might impact performance in certain scenarios. 3. **Dependencies**: ComponentKit has minimal dependencies and can be integrated into existing projects without major conflicts, making it suitable for projects with specific requirements. Render, on the other hand, has a larger dependency footprint which might lead to conflicts and compatibility issues. 4. **Community Support**: ComponentKit has a smaller but dedicated community that provides thorough documentation and support, making it suitable for projects that require extensive customization. Render, on the other hand, has a larger community with more resources available, making it easier to find solutions and resources. 5. **Flexibility**: ComponentKit offers a high level of flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to tailor UI components to specific project requirements. Render, while customizable, may have limitations in certain advanced UI design scenarios due to its more opinionated architecture. 6. **Learning Curve**: ComponentKit may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with its declarative approach to UI development, requiring a shift in mindset. Render, with its more imperative nature, may be more familiar to developers already versed in traditional UI development paradigms.

In Summary, ComponentKit and Render differ in their approach towards UI component structure, performance optimization, dependencies, community support, flexibility, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ComponentKit
ComponentKit
CoreRender
CoreRender

ComponentKit is an Objective-C++ view framework for iOS that is heavily inspired by React. It takes a functional, declarative approach to building UI. It was built to power Facebook's News Feed and is now used throughout the Facebook iOS app.

React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.8K
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Forks
582
GitHub Forks
96
Stacks
14
Stacks
56
Followers
28
Followers
55
Votes
5
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Built by Facebook
  • 1
    Reactive
  • 1
    Rapid Development
  • 1
    View Framework
  • 1
    Used by Facebook's News Feed
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
React
React
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to ComponentKit, CoreRender?

Weex

Weex

Weex renders code in native widgets in Android & iOS and helps preserve the quality of user experience on critical platforms.

SwiftUI

SwiftUI

Provides views, controls, and layout structures for declaring your app's user interface. The framework provides event handlers for delivering taps, gestures, and other types of input to your app.

React Native Material Design

React Native Material Design

An open source project which aims to bring Material Design to Android through React Native by Facebook. The library is made up of many components, which can be found in the sidebar.

Ratchet

Ratchet

Made by the creators of Twitter Bootstrap, Ratchet is a library that allows you to build mobile apps with simple HTML, CSS, and JS components.

jQuery Mobile

jQuery Mobile

jQuery Mobile is a HTML5-based user interface system designed to make responsive web sites and apps that are accessible on all smartphone, tablet and desktop devices.

React Native Paper

React Native Paper

Material design for React Native.

Reagent

Reagent

It allows you to define efficient React components using nothing but plain ClojureScript functions and data, that describe your UI using a Hiccup-like syntax.

react-native-ui-kitten

react-native-ui-kitten

react-native-ui-kitten is a framework that contains a set of commonly used UI components styled in a similar way. The main idea of this framework is to move style definitions into a specific place making components reusable and styled in a single way. You just focus on business logic and it takes care of visual appearance.

Classy

Classy

Not CSS. Instead of trying to force UIKit to fit CSS syntax, properties, conventions and constructs. Classy is a stylesheet system built from the ground up to work in harmony with UIKit. It borrows the best ideas from CSS and introduces new syntax, conventions and constructs where appropriate.

ChocolateChip-UI

ChocolateChip-UI

ChocolateChip-UI is a framework for making mobile Web apps. It has three components: semantic HTML5 markup, CSS and JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope