StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Confluent vs Kafka

Confluent vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
Confluent
Confluent
Stacks337
Followers239
Votes14

Confluent vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Confluent and Kafka, highlighting key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: Confluent is a platform built on top of Apache Kafka, providing additional features and capabilities. It includes a distributed streaming platform, multi-datacenter replication, and a schema registry. Kafka, on the other hand, is a distributed streaming platform that focuses on high-throughput, fault-tolerant, and scalable messaging.

  2. Management: Confluent provides an extensive set of management tools for Kafka, including the Control Center, which provides a GUI for monitoring, managing, and troubleshooting Kafka clusters. It also offers features like auto data balancing, automated alerts, and cluster expansion. Kafka, however, requires manual management of Kafka clusters through command-line tools and configuration files.

  3. Integration: Confluent integrates several additional components into the Kafka ecosystem, such as Kafka Connect, Kafka Streams, and the Confluent Schema Registry. These components enable easy data integration with external systems, stream processing, and schema management. Kafka, on the other hand, focuses primarily on stream processing and high-throughput data messaging.

  4. Enterprise Features: Confluent offers additional enterprise-level features, such as access control lists (ACLs), user authentication, advanced monitoring and alerting, and multi-datacenter replication. These features are not available in the core Kafka distribution, making Confluent a better choice for organizations with stringent security and compliance requirements. Kafka, however, provides a solid foundation for building scalable and fault-tolerant streaming applications.

  5. Ecosystem: The Confluent platform includes not only Kafka but also a rich ecosystem of connectors, tools, and libraries that are maintained and supported by Confluent. This ecosystem makes it easier for developers to build streaming applications using Kafka. In contrast, the Kafka ecosystem primarily consists of supported and contributed connectors and libraries, which may vary in terms of community support and maintenance.

  6. Support and Documentation: Confluent offers commercial support, consulting services, and training for Kafka, providing organizations with a higher level of support for their streaming applications. They also maintain comprehensive documentation and online resources for developers. Kafka, on the other hand, has a strong open-source community with active forums, mailing lists, and documentation, but commercial support may be limited to specific vendors.

In summary, Confluent is a platform built on top of Kafka, offering additional features, management tools, enterprise-level capabilities, and an extensive ecosystem. Kafka, on the other hand, provides a solid foundation for building scalable and fault-tolerant streaming applications, with a focus on high-throughput messaging and stream processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, Confluent

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.9k views10.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
Confluent
Confluent

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Reliable; High-performance stream data platform; Manage and organize data from different sources.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
337
Followers
22.3K
Followers
239
Votes
607
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Pros
  • 4
    Free for casual use
  • 3
    Dashboard for kafka insight
  • 3
    No hypercloud lock-in
  • 2
    Easily scalable
  • 2
    Zero devops
Cons
  • 1
    Proprietary
Integrations
No integrations available
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Java
Java
Python
Python
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Kafka Streams
Kafka Streams

What are some alternatives to Kafka, Confluent?

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase