Contiv vs Docker Swarm Visualizer

Overview

Docker Swarm Visualizer

Stacks25

Followers108

Votes3

Contiv

Stacks7

Followers9

Votes0

GitHub Stars518

Forks181

Contiv vs Docker Swarm Visualizer: What are the differences?

Introduction: Contiv and Docker Swarm Visualizer are two popular tools used in the world of containerization and container orchestration. While they both serve similar purposes, they have distinct differences in terms of functionality and features.

Integration with Kubernetes: Contiv is specifically designed to work seamlessly with Kubernetes, offering advanced networking and storage capabilities to enhance container orchestration within Kubernetes clusters. On the other hand, Docker Swarm Visualizer focuses primarily on providing a visual representation of Docker Swarm clusters, offering insights into the status and health of containers within the Swarm.
Feature Set: Contiv provides a comprehensive set of features for managing networking, storage, and security aspects of containers, making it a more extensive tool for Kubernetes environments. In contrast, Docker Swarm Visualizer focuses solely on visualizing Docker Swarm clusters and does not offer advanced capabilities for network and storage management.
Scalability: Contiv is known for its scalability and ability to handle large Kubernetes clusters with ease, making it a suitable choice for enterprises with complex container orchestration needs. Docker Swarm Visualizer, on the other hand, may face limitations in managing extremely large clusters efficiently.
Community Support: Docker Swarm Visualizer has a strong community support base, with regular updates and contributions from developers worldwide. Contiv, on the other hand, may have a more focused user base due to its specific integration with Kubernetes, which can affect the availability of community support and resources.
Customization Options: Contiv offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the tool according to their specific requirements and preferences. In contrast, Docker Swarm Visualizer may have limited customization capabilities, as its primary focus is on providing a visual representation of Docker Swarm clusters rather than offering advanced customization features.

In Summary, Contiv and Docker Swarm Visualizer have key differences in terms of integration with Kubernetes, feature set, scalability, community support, and customization options, making each tool suitable for different use cases in the world of container orchestration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Swarm Visualizer	Contiv
Each node in the swarm will show all tasks running on it. When a service goes down it'll be removed. When a node goes down it won't, instead the circle at the top will turn red to indicate it went down. Tasks will be removed.	It is a powerful, 100% open source networking solution for modern compute workloads. Integration and support for VM’s and Bare Metal allow you to provide a single network fabric across your infrastructure.
-	Rich Policy Framework; Multi-Platforms; Multi-Infrastructure; Networking Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 518
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 181
Stacks 25	Stacks 7
Followers 108	Followers 9
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Easy to deploy 1 Stateless 1 Reverse proxy support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Docker Swarm	Red Hat OpenShift Amazon S3 Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm Visualizer, Contiv?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Contiv vs Docker Swarm Visualizer: What are the differences?

Integration with Kubernetes: Contiv is specifically designed to work seamlessly with Kubernetes, offering advanced networking and storage capabilities to enhance container orchestration within Kubernetes clusters. On the other hand, Docker Swarm Visualizer focuses primarily on providing a visual representation of Docker Swarm clusters, offering insights into the status and health of containers within the Swarm.
Feature Set: Contiv provides a comprehensive set of features for managing networking, storage, and security aspects of containers, making it a more extensive tool for Kubernetes environments. In contrast, Docker Swarm Visualizer focuses solely on visualizing Docker Swarm clusters and does not offer advanced capabilities for network and storage management.
Scalability: Contiv is known for its scalability and ability to handle large Kubernetes clusters with ease, making it a suitable choice for enterprises with complex container orchestration needs. Docker Swarm Visualizer, on the other hand, may face limitations in managing extremely large clusters efficiently.
Community Support: Docker Swarm Visualizer has a strong community support base, with regular updates and contributions from developers worldwide. Contiv, on the other hand, may have a more focused user base due to its specific integration with Kubernetes, which can affect the availability of community support and resources.
Customization Options: Contiv offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the tool according to their specific requirements and preferences. In contrast, Docker Swarm Visualizer may have limited customization capabilities, as its primary focus is on providing a visual representation of Docker Swarm clusters rather than offering advanced customization features.

Contiv vs Docker Swarm Visualizer

Overview