Contiv vs Helios

Overview

Helios

Stacks21

Followers74

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.2K

Forks233

Contiv

Stacks7

Followers9

Votes0

GitHub Stars518

Forks181

Contiv vs Helios: What are the differences?

Introduction: Contiv and Helios are both popular container networking solutions that offer various features and functionalities. However, they have key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: Contiv is an open-source project that integrates with Kubernetes to provide networking and storage. It focuses on policy enforcement, micro-segmentation, and service insertion. On the other hand, Helios is a container orchestration system developed by Spotify, mainly for managing Docker containers. It emphasizes scalability and ease of use.
Networking: Contiv offers a robust networking solution with features like network isolation, load balancing, and secure communication between containers. It supports various networking modes, including overlay and direct. In contrast, Helios provides basic networking capabilities and relies on Docker's networking functionality for more advanced features.
Storage: Contiv includes storage capabilities to manage persistent volumes and offer storage policies. It integrates with various storage backends and enables dynamic volume provisioning. Helios, on the other hand, focuses primarily on container orchestration and does not directly provide storage solutions.
Community and Support: Contiv has a vibrant community of developers contributing to its ongoing development and support. It benefits from the backing of large organizations like Cisco. On the contrary, Helios was initially developed by Spotify but is now considered a legacy project with limited community support and updates.
Scalability and Deployment: Contiv is designed to scale efficiently in large Kubernetes deployments, providing advanced networking and storage features across clusters. It offers flexibility in deployment options, including on-premises and cloud environments. Helios, while suitable for smaller deployments, may face challenges in handling large-scale container environments efficiently.

In Summary, Contiv focuses on advanced networking and storage capabilities with strong community support and scalability for large deployments, while Helios emphasizes container orchestration with basic networking features and may lack extensive community backing and scalability for larger setups.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Helios	Contiv
Helios is a Docker orchestration platform for deploying and managing containers across an entire fleet of servers. Helios provides a HTTP API as well as a command-line client to interact with servers running your containers.	It is a powerful, 100% open source networking solution for modern compute workloads. Integration and support for VM’s and Bare Metal allow you to provide a single network fabric across your infrastructure.
Helios is pragmatic.; Helios fits into the way you already do ops.;Hihgly scalable	Rich Policy Framework; Multi-Platforms; Multi-Infrastructure; Networking Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.2K	GitHub Stars 518
GitHub Forks 233	GitHub Forks 181
Stacks 21	Stacks 7
Followers 74	Followers 9
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Docker	Red Hat OpenShift Amazon S3 Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Helios, Contiv?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Contiv vs Helios: What are the differences?

Introduction: Contiv and Helios are both popular container networking solutions that offer various features and functionalities. However, they have key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: Contiv is an open-source project that integrates with Kubernetes to provide networking and storage. It focuses on policy enforcement, micro-segmentation, and service insertion. On the other hand, Helios is a container orchestration system developed by Spotify, mainly for managing Docker containers. It emphasizes scalability and ease of use.
Networking: Contiv offers a robust networking solution with features like network isolation, load balancing, and secure communication between containers. It supports various networking modes, including overlay and direct. In contrast, Helios provides basic networking capabilities and relies on Docker's networking functionality for more advanced features.
Storage: Contiv includes storage capabilities to manage persistent volumes and offer storage policies. It integrates with various storage backends and enables dynamic volume provisioning. Helios, on the other hand, focuses primarily on container orchestration and does not directly provide storage solutions.
Community and Support: Contiv has a vibrant community of developers contributing to its ongoing development and support. It benefits from the backing of large organizations like Cisco. On the contrary, Helios was initially developed by Spotify but is now considered a legacy project with limited community support and updates.
Scalability and Deployment: Contiv is designed to scale efficiently in large Kubernetes deployments, providing advanced networking and storage features across clusters. It offers flexibility in deployment options, including on-premises and cloud environments. Helios, while suitable for smaller deployments, may face challenges in handling large-scale container environments efficiently.

Contiv vs Helios

Overview