CotEditor vs Emacs: What are the differences?
Developers describe CotEditor as "Open Source Plain-Text Editor for OS X". CotEditor is a lightweight plain-text editor for OS X. On the other hand, Emacs is detailed as "The extensible self-documenting text editor". GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.
CotEditor and Emacs belong to "Text Editor" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by CotEditor are:
- Syntax Highlighting
- Powerful Find & Replace
- Setting via Click
On the other hand, Emacs provides the following key features:
- Content-sensitive editing modes, including syntax coloring, for a variety of file types including plain text, source code, and HTML.
- Complete built-in documentation, including a tutorial for new users.
- Full Unicode support for nearly all human languages and their scripts.
"Excellent support for Japanese encoding" is the top reason why over 2 developers like CotEditor, while over 57 developers mention "Vast array of extensions" as the leading cause for choosing Emacs.
CotEditor is an open source tool with 2.77K GitHub stars and 252 GitHub forks. Here's a link to CotEditor's open source repository on GitHub.
What is CotEditor?
What is Emacs?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using CotEditor?
What are the cons of using Emacs?
What companies use CotEditor?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with CotEditor?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Emacs is my text editor/frontend to git/ blog editor/ filesystem explorer/ tool for editing remote files.