StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. CyberArk vs Pulse Secure

CyberArk vs Pulse Secure

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CyberArk
CyberArk
Stacks44
Followers72
Votes0
Pulse Secure
Pulse Secure
Stacks9
Followers15
Votes0

CyberArk vs Pulse Secure: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Integration Methodology: CyberArk primarily focuses on privileged access management solutions, helping organizations protect and manage their most critical assets. On the other hand, Pulse Secure specializes in secure access solutions, providing VPN and SDP solutions to ensure secure connectivity for remote and mobile users. While CyberArk emphasizes protecting privileged accounts and credentials, Pulse Secure focuses on secure remote access and connectivity.

2. Product Focus: CyberArk's core product offerings revolve around secure management of privileged accounts, credentials, and secrets, helping organizations prevent potential cyber threats and data breaches. In contrast, Pulse Secure's products are primarily designed to provide secure access solutions, enabling users to securely connect to corporate resources from remote locations or mobile devices. The key difference lies in the primary focus of CyberArk on privileged access management and that of Pulse Secure on secure access solutions for user connectivity.

3. Target Audience: CyberArk targets enterprises and organizations seeking to enhance their security posture by effectively managing and protecting privileged accounts and access to critical systems. Conversely, Pulse Secure caters to businesses looking to provide secure remote access solutions for their employees, partners, and customers, ensuring secure connectivity and access to corporate resources from any location. The distinction lies in the target audience, with CyberArk focusing on privileged access security and Pulse Secure on secure remote access solutions.

4. Technological Approach: CyberArk adopts a proactive security approach by securing privileged accounts and credentials through rigorous access controls, monitoring, and threat detection mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. In contrast, Pulse Secure utilizes secure access solutions such as VPN and software-defined perimeter (SDP) technologies to establish secure connectivity for remote users, ensuring secure data transmission and access across networks. The difference lies in the technological approach, with CyberArk emphasizing privilege access security and Pulse Secure focusing on secure remote access solutions.

5. Compliance Regulations: CyberArk places a significant emphasis on addressing compliance requirements such as GDPR, PCI DSS, and HIPAA by providing solutions that help organizations secure and manage privileged access in accordance with regulatory standards. Alternatively, Pulse Secure assists organizations in complying with regulations by offering secure access solutions that ensure data privacy and secure connectivity for remote users, enabling compliance with various industry standards. The key difference lies in how each company approaches compliance regulations, with CyberArk focusing on privileged access compliance and Pulse Secure on secure access compliance.

6. Deployment Flexibility: CyberArk offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, allowing organizations to choose the deployment method that best suits their infrastructure and security requirements. Conversely, Pulse Secure provides flexible deployment options for its secure access solutions, enabling organizations to deploy VPN and SDP solutions on-premises or in the cloud to accommodate diverse connectivity needs. The difference lies in the deployment flexibility offered by each company, with CyberArk focusing on privileged access deployment options and Pulse Secure on secure access deployment flexibility.

In Summary, CyberArk and Pulse Secure differ in their integration methodology, product focus, target audience, technological approach, compliance regulations, and deployment flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CyberArk
CyberArk
Pulse Secure
Pulse Secure

It is the only security software company focused on eliminating cyber threats using insider privileges to attack the heart of the enterprise.

Deliver easy, protected and available access to the data center and cloud with Pulse Secure products.

Email attachment protection; Credential protection and management; Session isolation and monitoring; Threat detection and analytics; End-to-end server protection; Domain controller protection; Activity monitoring; In-progress Kerberos attack detection
Zero Trust, Secure Access Checklist; IoT Security Best Practices Guide
Statistics
Stacks
44
Stacks
9
Followers
72
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Sentry
Sentry
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Mingle
Mingle
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CyberArk, Pulse Secure?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope