Cycle.io vs Harbor

Overview

Harbor

Stacks175

Followers185

Votes11

GitHub Stars26.8K

Forks5.0K

Cycle.io

Stacks7

Followers12

Votes0

Harbor vs Cycle.io: What are the differences?

What is Harbor? Manage and serve container images in a secure environment (created at VMware). Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ.

What is Cycle.io? A full-featured container orchestration and infrastructure management platform focused on simplicity. Cycle is a full-featured container orchestration and infrastructure management platform focused on simplicity. With a SaaS-managed operating system built specifically for containers, Cycle becomes the bridge between you and your infrastructure. Simplify the stack and gain the benefits of your own private cloud that spans multiple providers. Cycle functions as a drop-in DevOps team, empowering your developers to focus less on deployment, and more and development.

Harbor can be classified as a tool in the "Docker Registry" category, while Cycle.io is grouped under "Container Tools".

Some of the features offered by Harbor are:

Multi-tenant content signing and validation
Image replication between instances
Extensible API and graphical UI

On the other hand, Cycle.io provides the following key features:

Simple, powerful container orchestration
UI-focused
Multi-cloud

Harbor is an open source tool with 10.7K GitHub stars and 2.98K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Harbor's open source repository on GitHub.

Detailed Comparison

Harbor	Cycle.io
Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ	Cycle is the most developer-friendly container orchestration platform. By simplifying the processes around container and infrastructure deployments, Cycle enables developers to spend more time building and less time managing.
Multi-tenant content signing and validation;Image replication between instances;Extensible API and graphical UI;Security and vulnerability analysis;Identity integration and role-based access control;Internationalization	Simple, powerful container orchestration;UI-focused;Multi-cloud; Fully managed infrastructure;Built from the ground up;not based on Docker or Kubernetes;Fully integrated DevOps pipelines;Container native;Integrated DNS management;one-click deployment;built-in VPN service;automatic networking between providers/datacenters;supports AWS, Packet, Vultr, and more
Statistics
GitHub Stars 26.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 175	Stacks 7
Followers 185	Followers 12
Votes 11	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Good on-premises container registry 1 Support multiple authentication methods 1 Supports OIDC 1 Supports LDAP/Active Directory 1 Perfect for Teams and Organizations	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Kubernetes Helm	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Harbor, Cycle.io?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons