StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Cypress vs Nightwatchjs

Cypress vs Nightwatchjs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nightwatchjs
Nightwatchjs
Stacks214
Followers323
Votes11
GitHub Stars11.9K
Forks1.4K
Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K

Cypress vs Nightwatchjs: What are the differences?

Cypress and Nightwatch.js are both popular JavaScript end-to-end testing frameworks for web applications. Although they share similarities, there are key differences between them that distinguish their functionality and approach.

  1. Syntax and Structure: Cypress offers a declarative syntax that allows tests to be written more intuitively, while Nightwatch.js follows a traditional imperative approach. Cypress uses a more chained method style to write test cases, where each command acts on the previous ones. On the other hand, Nightwatch.js uses a simpler command-driven approach that can be easier for developers familiar with traditional testing frameworks.

  2. Architecture: Cypress runs directly in the browser and can directly manipulate application's internals, allowing for faster execution and real-time debugging. In contrast, Nightwatch.js uses WebDriver protocol to communicate with browsers, resulting in slower execution and less control over the application's internals.

  3. Installation and Configuration: Cypress requires a separate installation, as it runs in a Node.js process and requires its own dependencies. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, can be installed as a global package, making it easier to set up and configure.

  4. Test Execution: Cypress uses a unique architecture that allows it to run tests directly in the browser, providing real-time reloading and debugging features. Nightwatch.js runs tests in a separate WebDriver client/server setup, which can impact performance and make debugging more challenging.

  5. Automation Support: Cypress is designed specifically for web browser automation and supports modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries out of the box. Nightwatch.js, while also supporting web browser automation, provides more extensive support for various testing scenarios, such as mobile testing, integration with third-party tools, and using cloud services for testing.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Cypress has a smaller but rapidly growing community and ecosystem compared to Nightwatch.js. Nightwatch.js, being a mature and established framework, has a larger community and a wider range of plugins and integrations available.

In summary, Cypress offers a more intuitive syntax and architecture for writing tests, while Nightwatch.js provides a more traditional and versatile approach with extensive automation support and a larger community. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the testing project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nightwatchjs, Cypress

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nightwatchjs
Nightwatchjs
Cypress
Cypress

Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. It uses the powerful Selenium WebDriver API to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

e2e; test; javascript; nodejs
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.9K
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
214
Stacks
3.5K
Followers
323
Followers
2.0K
Votes
11
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Testing
  • 2
    Automates browsers
  • 1
    Cross-Browser Testing
  • 1
    Parallel Test Running
Cons
  • 2
    No automatic wait
  • 1
    Limited browser support
  • 1
    Configuration complexity
  • 1
    Limited native mobile app support
  • 1
    Less flexibility
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No page object support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Selenium
Selenium
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Nightwatchjs, Cypress?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana