Mojolicious vs Dancer | What are the differences?

Overview

Mojolicious

Stacks57

Followers63

Votes108

Dancer

Stacks39

Followers34

Votes4

GitHub Stars586

Forks279

Dancer vs Mojolicious: What are the differences?

Developers describe Dancer as "Simple but powerful web application framework for Perl". Dancer is a free and open source micro web application framework written in Perl. On the other hand, Mojolicious is detailed as "Perl real-time web framework". Back in the early days of the web, many people learned Perl because of a wonderful Perl library called CGI. It was simple enough to get started without knowing much about the language and powerful enough to keep you going, learning by doing was much fun. While most of the techniques used are outdated now, the idea behind it is not. Mojolicious is a new attempt at implementing this idea using state of the art technology.

Dancer and Mojolicious belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Dancer and Mojolicious are both open source tools. Mojolicious with 2.12K GitHub stars and 498 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Dancer with 446 GitHub stars and 264 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Turbo Frameworks

A set of techniques for creating fast, modern, progressively enhanced web apps

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

9

Detailed Comparison

Mojolicious	Dancer
Back in the early days of the web, many people learned Perl because of a wonderful Perl library called CGI. It was simple enough to get started without knowing much about the language and powerful enough to keep you going, learning by doing was much fun. While most of the techniques used are outdated now, the idea behind it is not. Mojolicious is a new attempt at implementing this idea using state of the art technology.	Dancer is a free and open source micro web application framework written in Perl.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 586
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 279
Stacks 57	Stacks 39
Followers 63	Followers 34
Votes 108	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 18 Perl is still awesome 17 Open source 16 Real-time 14 True async 12 WebSockets	Pros 1 Fast 1 Microframework 1 Stable 1 Easy
Integrations
Perl	Perl

What are some alternatives to Mojolicious, Dancer?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.