Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Dapr vs Docker: What are the differences?
Introduction
Dapr and Docker are both widely used technologies in the software development and deployment space. While they serve different purposes, understanding the key differences between them is crucial for developers and operators.
1. Containerization vs. Runtime for Microservices:
Docker is primarily a containerization platform that allows developers to package applications along with their dependencies into containers. It provides an isolated and consistent runtime environment for applications across different platforms. On the other hand, Dapr is a runtime for microservices that abstracts away the complexities of distributed systems. It provides a set of building blocks and APIs to make it easier to build microservices-based applications with features like service invocation, pub/sub messaging, and state management.
2. Level of Abstraction:
Docker provides a high level of abstraction by encapsulating the entire application stack into containers. It allows developers to focus on building and packaging their applications without worrying about the infrastructure details. Dapr, on the other hand, operates at a higher level of abstraction by providing a runtime that abstracts away the complexities of distributed systems. It allows developers to focus on building the business logic of their microservices without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
3. Dependency Management:
Docker handles dependencies by bundling all the required dependencies and libraries into the container image. This ensures that the application runs consistently across different environments. Dapr, on the other hand, relies on external dependencies that can be managed and accessed via its runtime. It allows developers to leverage existing infrastructure components like message brokers, databases, and caching systems.
4. Portability:
Docker provides a high degree of portability as containers can run on any platform that supports Docker. This enables developers to easily deploy their applications on different environments without any modifications. Dapr, on the other hand, is also designed to be portable, but it requires the underlying infrastructure to have Dapr runtime installed. While Dapr supports multiple programming languages, portability may be constrained by the availability of Dapr runtime on the target platform.
5. Composability:
Docker allows developers to compose complex applications by orchestrating multiple containers using tools like Docker Compose and Kubernetes. It provides a unified way to define and manage the composition of containers. Dapr, on the other hand, focuses on the runtime aspects of microservices and provides building blocks for composing microservices-based applications. It allows developers to define interactions and connections between different microservices using Dapr APIs.
6. Management and Monitoring:
Docker provides tools for managing and monitoring containers, such as Docker Swarm and third-party tools like Prometheus and Grafana. It allows operators to monitor the containerized applications, scale them, and manage their lifecycle. Dapr, on the other hand, provides observability features like distributed tracing and metrics collection as part of its runtime. It also integrates with existing monitoring and observability tools to provide insights into the microservices-based applications.
In Summary, Docker is a containerization platform that abstracts away the complexities of packaging and deploying applications, while Dapr is a runtime for microservices that provides building blocks for building distributed systems.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Dapr
- Manage inter-service state3
- MTLS "for free"2
- App dashboard for rapid log overview2
- Zipkin app tracing "for free"2
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Dapr
- Additional overhead1
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3