StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Dapr vs Nameko

Dapr vs Nameko

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468
Dapr
Dapr
Stacks96
Followers336
Votes9
GitHub Stars25.2K
Forks2.0K

Dapr vs Nameko: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Model: Dapr is designed to be deployed as a sidecar, running alongside the application services, while Nameko is typically deployed as a microservice framework within the application architecture.
  2. Language Support: Dapr supports multiple programming languages, including C#, Java, and Python, offering more flexibility to developers. On the other hand, Nameko is primarily focused on Python, limiting its language capabilities.
  3. Inter-Service Communication: Dapr provides out-of-the-box features for service-to-service communication, such as pub/sub and state management, making it easier to build distributed systems. Nameko, while capable of handling inter-service communication, requires more manual configuration and setup in comparison to Dapr.
  4. Community Support: Dapr has a larger and more active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources for developers. Nameko, while having a dedicated user base, may not offer the same level of community support as Dapr.
  5. Service Mesh Integration: Dapr can seamlessly integrate with popular service mesh solutions like Istio, allowing for enhanced observability and security features, which may require additional configuration when using Nameko.

In Summary, Dapr and Nameko differ in their deployment model, language support, inter-service communication capabilities, community support, and service mesh integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nameko, Dapr

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nameko
Nameko
Dapr
Dapr

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Event-driven Pub-Sub system with pluggable providers and at-least-once semantics; Input and Output bindings with pluggable providers; State management with pluggable data stores; Consistent service-to-service discovery and invocation; Opt-in stateful models: Strong/Eventual consistency, First-write/Last-write wins; Cross platform Virtual Actors; Rate limiting; Built-in distributed tracing using Open Telemetry; Runs natively on Kubernetes using a dedicated Operator and CRDs; Supports all programming languages via HTTP and gRPC; Multi-Cloud, open components (bindings, pub-sub, state) from Azure, AWS, GCP; Runs anywhere - as a process or containerized; Lightweight (58MB binary, 4MB physical memory); Runs as a sidecar - removes the need for special SDKs or libraries; Dedicated CLI - developer friendly experience with easy debugging; Clients for Java, Dotnet, Go, Javascript and Python
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
25.2K
GitHub Forks
468
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
20
Stacks
96
Followers
79
Followers
336
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Manage inter-service state
  • 2
    MTLS "for free"
  • 2
    Zipkin app tracing "for free"
  • 2
    App dashboard for rapid log overview
Cons
  • 1
    Additional overhead
Integrations
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy
.NET Core
.NET Core
Java
Java
Python
Python
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Nameko, Dapr?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana