Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
DataGrip vs MySQL WorkBench: What are the differences?
DataGrip and MySQL Workbench are both popular tools used for managing and interacting with MySQL databases. Let's explore the key differences between them.
User Interface: DataGrip offers a more intuitive and customizable user interface compared to MySQL Workbench. It provides a sleek and modern design with a wide range of customization options for a personalized experience. On the other hand, MySQL Workbench has a more traditional and dated interface with limited customization capabilities.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: DataGrip is a multi-platform tool that supports various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it suitable for developers working on different platforms. In contrast, MySQL Workbench has limited cross-platform compatibility and is primarily designed for Windows users.
Advanced Code Assistance: DataGrip offers comprehensive code assistance features, such as intelligent code completion, code inspections, and refactoring options. It provides suggestions and warnings as you write code, helping to improve the quality and efficiency of your queries. MySQL Workbench, while offering basic code assistance, lacks the advanced features available in DataGrip.
Integration with Other Tools: DataGrip seamlessly integrates with other JetBrains IDEs and tools, such as IntelliJ IDEA and PyCharm. This allows for a unified development environment, making it easier to switch between different projects and databases. MySQL Workbench, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with external tools.
Query Execution: DataGrip allows for the execution of multiple queries simultaneously, which can greatly improve productivity when working with large and complex databases. MySQL Workbench, on the other hand, only allows for the execution of one query at a time, potentially slowing down the development process.
Visual Database Design: MySQL Workbench excels in visual database design capabilities with its built-in modeling tools. It allows for the creation and modification of database schemas using a graphical interface, making it easier to design and manage database structures visually. DataGrip, while providing basic visual design features, does not have the same level of sophistication as MySQL Workbench in this area.
In summary, DataGrip offers a more modern, cross-platform compatible, and advanced code assistance experience compared to MySQL Workbench. It also provides better integration with other tools and the ability to execute multiple queries simultaneously. However, MySQL Workbench outshines DataGrip in terms of visual database design capabilities.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
We were looking a tool that would allow us to do MySQL and PostgreSQL development/administration from a single tool. We decided on Navicat Premium because it can connect to MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases - and simultaneously. It's also compatible with Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure, which we also use.
Moreover, we previously experienced the occasional freezing and crashing in MySQL Workbench. It also suffered from a poor design, with certain features being a bit difficult to find. Meanwhile, phpMyAdmin lacked schema visualization tools and seemed better suited to lightweight day to day transactions than some of the big jobs that we needed to do.
Pros of DataGrip
- Works on Linux, Windows and MacOS4
- Code analysis3
- Diff viewer2
- Wide range of DBMS support2
- Generate ERD1
- Quick-fixes using keyboard shortcuts1
- Database introspection on 21 different dbms1
- Export data using a variety of formats using open api1
- Import data1
- Code completion1
Pros of MySQL WorkBench
- Free7
- Simple7
- Easy to use6
- Clean UI5
- Administration and monitoring module3