StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Debian vs Photon

Debian vs Photon

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Debian
Debian
Stacks16.4K
Followers11.2K
Votes164
Photon
Photon
Stacks32
Followers89
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.1K
Forks573

Debian vs Photon: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Debian and Photon

Debian and Photon are both Linux-based operating systems, but they have several key differences in terms of their target audience, package management, support, and deployment options. Here are six specific differences between Debian and Photon:

  1. Target Audience: Debian is known for its stability and focus on providing a reliable operating system for general-purpose use. It caters to a wide range of users, including desktop users, servers, and embedded systems. On the other hand, Photon is specifically designed for containerization and cloud-native applications, targeting developers and organizations adopting modern deployment models.

  2. Package Management: Debian uses the Advanced Package Tool (APT) as its package management system. It relies on the Debian package format (.deb) and offers a vast number of software packages through its repositories. Photon, in contrast, utilizes the RPM package manager and supports its own package format (.rpm). It offers a more streamlined package management process tailored for containerized environments.

  3. Support: Debian has a well-established community-driven support model, with a vast community and forums available for users to seek help and to contribute. It also benefits from being a part of the wider Linux ecosystem, allowing users to share knowledge and solutions. Photon, on the other hand, is backed by VMware, providing enterprise-level support and additional resources such as documentation and forums specifically focused on containerization and cloud-native applications.

  4. Default Installation: Debian offers a minimal installation option, where users can choose a base system and customize it according to their needs by manually installing additional software packages. Photon, on the other hand, provides a slimmed-down, minimal operating system by default, which includes only the essential components required for containerization. This minimal footprint makes Photon an ideal choice for resource-constrained environments.

  5. Networking Capabilities: Debian has a robust network stack that supports a wide range of networking features, making it suitable for various networking scenarios. Photon, being specific to containerization and cloud-native applications, focuses on optimizing networking specifically for containers. It includes features such as VMware NSX integration and the Container Networking Interface (CNI), allowing for enhanced networking capabilities within containerized environments.

  6. Virtualization vs Containerization: Debian is a general-purpose operating system that supports both virtualization and containerization. It can be used for running virtual machines using Hypervisors like KVM or running containers using tools like Docker and Kubernetes. Photon, on the other hand, is designed to be a lightweight and optimized operating system specifically for containerization. It provides an optimized environment for running containerized applications by reducing the overhead of running a full-fledged operating system.

In summary, Debian caters to a wider audience, offers a vast software repository, and supports both virtualization and containerization. Photon, while focused on containerization, provides a minimal footprint, optimized networking for containers, and is supported by VMware.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Debian
Debian
Photon
Photon

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
573
Stacks
16.4K
Stacks
32
Followers
11.2K
Followers
89
Votes
164
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 54
    Massively supported
  • 50
    Stable
  • 21
    Reliable
  • 9
    Aptitude
  • 8
    Turnkey linux use it
Cons
  • 10
    Old versions of software
  • 2
    Can be difficult to set up on vanilla Debian
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Electron
Electron

What are some alternatives to Debian, Photon?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase