Devise vs Firebase Authentication

Overview

Devise

Stacks535

Followers232

Votes56

Firebase Authentication

Stacks533

Followers610

Votes55

Devise vs Firebase Authentication: What are the differences?

Scalability: Devise is a traditional authentication solution that mainly relies on server-side processing, which can lead to scalability issues as the user base increases. In contrast, Firebase Authentication offers a scalable solution that offloads much of the authentication processing to Firebase servers, allowing for better scalability and performance as the app grows.
Real-time Updates: Firebase Authentication provides real-time updates for user authentication states, which can be critical for features requiring immediate user access control. Devise, on the other hand, may require additional implementation to achieve real-time updates, making it less suitable for applications that heavily rely on instant authentication status changes.
Social Login Integration: Firebase Authentication offers built-in support for social login providers like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, simplifying the integration process and enhancing the user experience. Devise requires additional configuration and gems to enable social login, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Offline Support: Firebase Authentication provides offline support, allowing users to authenticate even when the device is offline. This is crucial for applications that need to maintain user authentication in limited connectivity scenarios. Devise, being primarily server-dependent, may face challenges in offering seamless offline authentication capabilities.
Secure Token Handling: Firebase Authentication utilizes secure token-based authentication mechanisms that facilitate secure data transmission and user authentication. Devise, while secure, may not offer the same level of built-in token security features as Firebase Authentication, potentially requiring additional customization for robust token handling.
Ease of Use: Firebase Authentication comes with easy-to-use SDKs and comprehensive documentation, making it simpler for developers to integrate authentication into their applications. Devise, although versatile, may require a steeper learning curve and more extensive configuration, especially for developers unfamiliar with Ruby on Rails.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication offers scalability, real-time updates, social login integration, offline support, secure token handling, and ease of use compared to Devise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise	Firebase Authentication
Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden	It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,
Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.	-
Statistics
Stacks 535	Stacks 533
Followers 232	Followers 610
Votes 56	Votes 55
Pros & Cons
Pros 33 Reliable 17 Open Source 4 Support for neo4j database 2 Secure	Pros 12 Completely Free 8 Email/Password 8 Native App + Web integrations 7 Passwordless 6 Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services Cons 6 Heavy webpack
Integrations
Rails	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Devise, Firebase Authentication?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Related Comparisons

Devise vs Firebase Authentication: What are the differences?

Scalability: Devise is a traditional authentication solution that mainly relies on server-side processing, which can lead to scalability issues as the user base increases. In contrast, Firebase Authentication offers a scalable solution that offloads much of the authentication processing to Firebase servers, allowing for better scalability and performance as the app grows.
Real-time Updates: Firebase Authentication provides real-time updates for user authentication states, which can be critical for features requiring immediate user access control. Devise, on the other hand, may require additional implementation to achieve real-time updates, making it less suitable for applications that heavily rely on instant authentication status changes.
Social Login Integration: Firebase Authentication offers built-in support for social login providers like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, simplifying the integration process and enhancing the user experience. Devise requires additional configuration and gems to enable social login, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Offline Support: Firebase Authentication provides offline support, allowing users to authenticate even when the device is offline. This is crucial for applications that need to maintain user authentication in limited connectivity scenarios. Devise, being primarily server-dependent, may face challenges in offering seamless offline authentication capabilities.
Secure Token Handling: Firebase Authentication utilizes secure token-based authentication mechanisms that facilitate secure data transmission and user authentication. Devise, while secure, may not offer the same level of built-in token security features as Firebase Authentication, potentially requiring additional customization for robust token handling.
Ease of Use: Firebase Authentication comes with easy-to-use SDKs and comprehensive documentation, making it simpler for developers to integrate authentication into their applications. Devise, although versatile, may require a steeper learning curve and more extensive configuration, especially for developers unfamiliar with Ruby on Rails.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication offers scalability, real-time updates, social login integration, offline support, secure token handling, and ease of use compared to Devise.

Devise vs Firebase Authentication

Overview