StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Devise vs Monotp

Devise vs Monotp

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
Monotp
Monotp
Stacks7
Followers8
Votes0

Devise vs Monotp: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In web development, understanding the key differences between Devise and Monotp is crucial for choosing the right authentication solution for your project.

  1. Customization: Devise offers a high level of customization with built-in modules and a variety of configuration options, making it suitable for complex authentication requirements. On the other hand, Monotp provides a more straightforward authentication mechanism without extensive customization capabilities, which may be more suitable for simple projects.

  2. Two-factor Authentication: Devise does not have built-in support for two-factor authentication, requiring developers to implement this feature manually or use additional gems. In contrast, Monotp comes with built-in support for two-factor authentication, making it a convenient choice for projects that prioritize security.

  3. Maintenance and Updates: Devise has a larger user base and more frequent updates, ensuring better support and maintenance in the long run. Monotp, while reliable, may have a slower update cycle and a smaller community, potentially leading to delays in addressing issues or implementing new features.

  4. Documentation: Devise offers comprehensive documentation with detailed guides and examples, making it easier for developers to understand and utilize its features effectively. Monotp, on the other hand, may have less extensive documentation, requiring developers to rely more on trial and error or community support.

  5. Extensibility: Devise provides a robust ecosystem with various extensions and plugins that enhance its functionality, allowing developers to easily extend its capabilities for different requirements. Monotp, while functional, may have limited extensibility options, making it less suitable for projects that require advanced customization or integration with other services.

  6. Community Support: Devise has a vibrant community with active forums, Stack Overflow threads, and GitHub repositories, offering ample resources for troubleshooting, sharing best practices, and finding solutions to common issues. Monotp, while supported by a dedicated user base, may not have as many resources or community engagement, potentially resulting in slower response times to queries or challenges.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Devise and Monotp is essential for choosing the most suitable authentication solution based on your project requirements and development expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
Monotp
Monotp

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

It converts your passive OTP process to active push notification. It works like magic! When you use it's Chrome Extension, it will identify your visited website's OTP request and will send it to your mobile phone as a push notification. When you Accept that request on your phone, your code will be generated on your mobile phone and send it back to the Chrome Extension. That extension will put your OTP code to the OTP text box and will redirect you to the application automatically.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
Cloud-first (Backup your tokens and never lose them again); Import options from different OTP Apps; 4 to 10 digits code support; Period support for different states; SHA1, SHA256, and SHA512 support; HOTP support
Statistics
Stacks
535
Stacks
7
Followers
232
Followers
8
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rails
Rails
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Devise, Monotp?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope