StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Devise vs Passport

Devise vs Passport

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
Passport
Passport
Stacks471
Followers368
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.5K
Forks1.2K

Devise vs Passport: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Devise and Passport

Introduction Devise and Passport are two popular authentication libraries used in web development. While both serve the purpose of user authentication, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Implementation Language: Devise is primarily designed for Ruby on Rails applications, while Passport is commonly used with Node.js. This means that Devise integrates seamlessly with Ruby on Rails features and conventions, such as ActiveRecord for managing database records. Passport, on the other hand, leverages the asynchronous and event-driven nature of Node.js, making it a good fit for JavaScript-based applications.

  2. Community and Ecosystem: Devise has a long-standing community and a large number of contributors, making it a mature and well-documented library. It has a wide range of plugins and extensions available, providing additional functionality and customization options. Passport, although not as mature as Devise, has a growing community and a modular design that allows developers to easily integrate various authentication strategies.

  3. Authentication Strategies: Devise mainly focuses on username/password authentication, providing features like session management, password encryption, and email confirmation. Passport, on the other hand, is a library that handles authentication through multiple strategies, including local username/password, social login (such as Google, Facebook, etc.), and token-based authentication using JSON Web Tokens (JWT). This flexibility makes Passport more suitable for applications that require different authentication methods.

  4. Middleware vs Engine: Devise is implemented as a Rails engine, which means it provides a set of predefined routes, views, and controllers that can be easily customized. Passport, on the other hand, is a middleware that can be used with any Node.js framework. It does not provide any UI components or pre-defined routes, giving developers more flexibility to design their own authentication flow.

  5. Database and ORM: Devise is tightly integrated with ActiveRecord, the default ORM for Ruby on Rails. It provides built-in database models and migrations for user-related functionality. Passport, being framework-agnostic, does not make any assumptions about the database or ORM being used. It allows developers to choose their preferred database and ORM, such as Sequelize or MongoDB, providing more flexibility in terms of database choices.

  6. Learning Curve: Devise follows the conventions of Ruby on Rails and provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for implementing authentication. If you are already familiar with Ruby on Rails, it is relatively straightforward to get started with Devise. Passport, being a JavaScript library, requires knowledge of JavaScript and Node.js concepts. It may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to JavaScript or Node.js.

In summary, Devise and Passport differ in their implementation language, community support, authentication strategies, implementation style, database compatibility, and learning curve. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your project and your familiarity with the respective technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Devise, Passport

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
Passport
Passport

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
Single sign-on with OpenID and OAuth; Easily handle success and failure
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
23.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
535
Stacks
471
Followers
232
Followers
368
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rails
Rails
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Vue.js
Vue.js
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

What are some alternatives to Devise, Passport?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope