StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Django REST framework JWT vs Keycloak

Django REST framework JWT vs Keycloak

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102
Django REST framework JWT
Django REST framework JWT
Stacks59
Followers151
Votes2
GitHub Stars3.2K
Forks653

Django REST framework JWT vs Keycloak: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Django REST framework JWT and Keycloak. Django REST framework JWT is a JSON Web Token authentication plugin for Django REST framework, providing a single-sign-on experience for users. Keycloak, on the other hand, is an open-source Identity and Access Management solution designed to secure modern applications and services.

  1. User Management: One key difference is the user management system. Django REST framework JWT relies on the Django authentication system and provides features like user registration, login, and password reset out-of-the-box. Keycloak, on the other hand, has a more comprehensive user management system with features like multi-factor authentication, social login, and user federation to external identity providers.

  2. Scalability: Another significant difference is the scalability. Django REST framework JWT is primarily designed for single-server setups, whereas Keycloak is designed to handle large-scale, distributed systems with a high volume of users. Keycloak provides features like clustering and horizontal scaling to ensure high availability and scalability.

  3. Integration: Django REST framework JWT is tightly integrated with Django and works as an extension of the Django authentication system. It seamlessly integrates with Django's user model and provides authentication and authorization capabilities. Keycloak, on the other hand, can be integrated with various programming languages, frameworks, and platforms through its OpenID Connect and OAuth2 protocols.

  4. Security Features: When it comes to security features, Keycloak offers a wide range of options. It supports a variety of authentication mechanisms, including username/password, social login (Facebook, Google, etc.), and two-factor authentication. Keycloak also provides features like fine-grained access control, role-based authorization, and client certificate authentication. Django REST framework JWT, on the other hand, primarily focuses on JWT-based authentication and provides basic token-based authentication and authorization.

  5. Community and Support: Django REST framework JWT is a popular plugin within the Django community and has an active community support. It benefits from the larger Django ecosystem and has extensive documentation and resources available. Keycloak, being an open-source project, also has a large community and provides extensive documentation, support forums, and professional services for enterprise users.

  6. Flexibility and Customization: Another notable difference is the level of flexibility and customization. Django REST framework JWT provides a solid foundation for authentication and authorization in Django projects and can be extended and customized as per the project requirements. Keycloak, on the other hand, provides a highly customizable solution with options to create custom themes, extend existing functionality with plugins, and integrate with external systems.

In summary, Django REST framework JWT and Keycloak differ in terms of user management, scalability, integration capabilities, security features, community support, and flexibility. While Django REST framework JWT is more focused on Django-based projects and provides a simpler authentication solution, Keycloak offers a comprehensive Identity and Access Management solution with advanced features for large-scale applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Keycloak, Django REST framework JWT

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
Django REST framework JWT
Django REST framework JWT

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

This package provides JSON Web Token Authentication support for Django REST framework. Unlike some more typical uses of JWTs, this module only generates authentication tokens that will verify the user who is requesting one of your DRF protected API resources.

-
JSON Web Token Authentication ; Django REST framework; Generates authentication tokens
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
653
Stacks
780
Stacks
59
Followers
1.3K
Followers
151
Votes
102
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
Pros
  • 2
    Stateless
Integrations
No integrations available
Django REST framework
Django REST framework
Python
Python
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Django
Django

What are some alternatives to Keycloak, Django REST framework JWT?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope