Django REST framework JWT vs OpenID Connect

Overview

OpenID Connect

Stacks233

Followers133

Votes0

Django REST framework JWT

Stacks59

Followers151

Votes2

GitHub Stars3.2K

Forks653

Django REST framework JWT vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

Token Format: Django REST framework JWT uses JSON Web Tokens (JWT) for authentication, which stores encoded user information in a compact format. On the other hand, OpenID Connect uses an identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol, which allows clients to verify the identity of the end-user based on the authentication performed by an authorization server.
Scope of Use: Django REST framework JWT is mainly focused on providing token-based authentication for APIs built using Django. In contrast, OpenID Connect is designed for providing identity layer on top of OAuth 2.0, making it more suitable for user authentication and authorization in web and mobile applications.
Token Handling: Django REST framework JWT relies on the client to securely store and handle the JWT token, which may expose the token to potential security risks if not properly managed. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, provides standard mechanisms for securely storing and handling tokens, reducing the risk of token exposure and misuse.
User Authentication: Django REST framework JWT primarily focuses on providing authentication through tokens generated by the server, while OpenID Connect enables user authentication through an external identity provider, allowing for single sign-on (SSO) capabilities across multiple applications.
Token Revocation: Django REST framework JWT lacks built-in support for token revocation, making it challenging to invalidate tokens in case of security breaches or user logouts. In contrast, OpenID Connect provides mechanisms for token revocation, allowing for better control and security over user sessions.
Scalability: Django REST framework JWT may face scalability issues when handling a large number of users due to the limitations of JWT size and server validation overhead. OpenID Connect, being more streamlined and standardized, offers better scalability options for handling authentication and authorization requirements in larger applications.

In Summary, Django REST framework JWT and OpenID Connect differ in token format, scope of use, token handling, user authentication, token revocation, and scalability options, providing distinct authentication and authorization solutions for different application requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenID Connect	Django REST framework JWT
It is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows Clients to verify the identity of the End-User based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the End-User in an interoperable and REST-like manner.	This package provides JSON Web Token Authentication support for Django REST framework. Unlike some more typical uses of JWTs, this module only generates authentication tokens that will verify the user who is requesting one of your DRF protected API resources.
-	JSON Web Token Authentication ; Django REST framework; Generates authentication tokens
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 653
Stacks 233	Stacks 59
Followers 133	Followers 151
Votes 0	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Stateless
Integrations
JSON Web Token Spring Security OAuth2	Django REST framework Python JSON Web Token Django

What are some alternatives to OpenID Connect, Django REST framework JWT?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Django REST framework JWT vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

Token Format: Django REST framework JWT uses JSON Web Tokens (JWT) for authentication, which stores encoded user information in a compact format. On the other hand, OpenID Connect uses an identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol, which allows clients to verify the identity of the end-user based on the authentication performed by an authorization server.
Scope of Use: Django REST framework JWT is mainly focused on providing token-based authentication for APIs built using Django. In contrast, OpenID Connect is designed for providing identity layer on top of OAuth 2.0, making it more suitable for user authentication and authorization in web and mobile applications.
Token Handling: Django REST framework JWT relies on the client to securely store and handle the JWT token, which may expose the token to potential security risks if not properly managed. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, provides standard mechanisms for securely storing and handling tokens, reducing the risk of token exposure and misuse.
User Authentication: Django REST framework JWT primarily focuses on providing authentication through tokens generated by the server, while OpenID Connect enables user authentication through an external identity provider, allowing for single sign-on (SSO) capabilities across multiple applications.
Token Revocation: Django REST framework JWT lacks built-in support for token revocation, making it challenging to invalidate tokens in case of security breaches or user logouts. In contrast, OpenID Connect provides mechanisms for token revocation, allowing for better control and security over user sessions.
Scalability: Django REST framework JWT may face scalability issues when handling a large number of users due to the limitations of JWT size and server validation overhead. OpenID Connect, being more streamlined and standardized, offers better scalability options for handling authentication and authorization requirements in larger applications.

Django REST framework JWT vs OpenID Connect

Overview