StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Django vs Rails

.NET vs Django vs Rails

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails
Rails
Stacks20.2K
Followers13.8K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks22.0K
Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K

.NET vs Django vs Rails: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will explore the key differences between .NET, Django, and Rails, three popular web development frameworks.

  1. Language Used: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft and primarily uses the C# programming language. On the other hand, Django is a Python-based framework, while Rails is built using Ruby. These different languages bring their own syntax and paradigms to the table, influencing how developers write code within each framework.

  2. Architecture and Approach: .NET follows a multi-tier architecture, separating the application into different layers such as presentation, business logic, and data access. It emphasizes Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) and provides extensive tools and libraries for building large-scale enterprise applications. In contrast, Django follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, where the application is divided into models, views, and templates. It is highly suitable for rapid development and encourages convention over configuration. Rails, similar to Django, also follows the MVC pattern and promotes the "Convention over Configuration" philosophy.

  3. Development Time: Due to the nature of the languages used, .NET applications may take longer to develop compared to Django or Rails. C# and Ruby both provide concise syntax and powerful libraries that allow developers to write code quickly and efficiently. Django further speeds up development with its built-in administrative interface, which provides automatic CRUD operations and authentication capabilities. Rails, with its focus on convention over configuration, also aims to minimize the development time required.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: .NET benefits from a large and active developer community, as well as comprehensive documentation and support from Microsoft. It also has a vast ecosystem of third-party libraries and frameworks. Django, being built with Python, also enjoys a vibrant community and benefits from the extensive Python ecosystem. Rails, built with Ruby, has its own active community and a rich collection of Ruby gems that provide additional functionality.

  5. Portability and Deployment: .NET applications can be deployed on both Windows and Linux servers, but they are considered to be more suitable for Windows environments. Django, being based on Python, offers excellent portability and can be deployed on various operating systems. Rails, built with Ruby, also enjoys portability and can be deployed on different platforms.

  6. Scalability and Performance: .NET applications are known for their scalability and performance, making them particularly well-suited for enterprise-level applications with high demands. It leverages the power of the .NET Framework and provides access to various performance optimization techniques. Django, being built with Python, may not scale as well as .NET for extremely high traffic websites but still performs adequately for most applications. Rails, built with Ruby, is generally considered to have lower performance compared to .NET and Django, although it can still handle medium-scale projects effectively.

In summary, .NET, Django, and Rails differ in the programming languages used, architectural approach, development time, community support, portability, and scalability. Each framework has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project at hand.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails, Django, .NET

Shivam
Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsJavaJavaRailsRails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 19, 2020

Decided

As a small team, we wanted to pick the framework which allowed us to move quickly. There's no option better than Rails. Not having to solve the fundamentals means we can more quickly build our feature set. No other framework can beat ActiveRecord in terms of integration & ease-of use. To top it all of, there's a lot of attention paid to security in the framework, making almost everything safe-by-default.

482k views482k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails
Rails
Django
Django
.NET
.NET

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

--
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Forks
22.0K
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
20.2K
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
15.4K
Followers
13.8K
Followers
34.8K
Followers
5.9K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
4.2K
Votes
1.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 860
    Rapid development
  • 653
    Great gems
  • 607
    Great community
  • 486
    Convention over configuration
  • 418
    Mvc
Cons
  • 24
    Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
  • 14
    Poor raw performance
  • 12
    Asset system is too primitive and outdated
  • 6
    Bloat in models
  • 6
    Heavy use of mixins
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic

What are some alternatives to Rails, Django, .NET?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Play

Play

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase