Docker Compose vs Gitblit

Overview

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Gitblit

Stacks18

Followers55

Votes4

Docker Compose vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Docker Compose and Gitblit.

Deployment Focus: Docker Compose focuses on container deployment, allowing users to define and run multi-container Docker applications easily. On the other hand, Gitblit is a web-based Git-repository manager with a focus on providing a user-friendly interface for managing Git repositories.
Container Orchestration: Docker Compose is primarily used for defining and managing multi-container Docker applications, making it a suitable choice for orchestrating containers during development and testing phases. Gitblit, however, does not have container orchestration capabilities and is more focused on managing Git repositories.
Functionality: Docker Compose is designed to simplify the process of defining and running multi-container Docker applications by using a YAML file format. Gitblit, on the other hand, provides Git repository management features such as code reviews, pull requests, and repository browsing.
Integration: Docker Compose is often used in conjunction with Docker Engine to manage containers efficiently, providing an integrated solution for containerized applications. Gitblit, on the other hand, can be integrated with various version control systems like Git to centrally manage repositories.
Scalability: Docker Compose is scalable and can be used to define complex application architectures with multiple containers running in a distributed environment. Gitblit, on the other hand, is more suited for managing code repositories and may not offer the same level of scalability for container orchestration.

In Summary, Docker Compose focuses on container deployment and orchestration, while Gitblit is more specialized in managing Git repositories with features like code reviews and pull requests.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose	Gitblit
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.	Gitblit is an open source, pure Java Git solution for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It can serve repositories over the GIT, HTTP, and SSH transports; it can authenticate against multiple providers; and it allows you to get up-and-running with an attractive, capable Git server in less than 5 minutes.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 36.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 22.3K	Stacks 18
Followers 16.5K	Followers 55
Votes 501	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often	Pros 1 Free 1 Easy to setup. Runs on OSX 1 Fast and fulfill just the features I need 1 Better user & group management 0 Run on Windows Cons 2 Confusing UI 0 No Pull Requests 0 No code review functionality 0 Squash and Merge is not supported 0 No active development
Integrations
Docker	Git

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Gitblit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Docker Compose vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Docker Compose and Gitblit.

Deployment Focus: Docker Compose focuses on container deployment, allowing users to define and run multi-container Docker applications easily. On the other hand, Gitblit is a web-based Git-repository manager with a focus on providing a user-friendly interface for managing Git repositories.
Container Orchestration: Docker Compose is primarily used for defining and managing multi-container Docker applications, making it a suitable choice for orchestrating containers during development and testing phases. Gitblit, however, does not have container orchestration capabilities and is more focused on managing Git repositories.
Functionality: Docker Compose is designed to simplify the process of defining and running multi-container Docker applications by using a YAML file format. Gitblit, on the other hand, provides Git repository management features such as code reviews, pull requests, and repository browsing.
Integration: Docker Compose is often used in conjunction with Docker Engine to manage containers efficiently, providing an integrated solution for containerized applications. Gitblit, on the other hand, can be integrated with various version control systems like Git to centrally manage repositories.
Scalability: Docker Compose is scalable and can be used to define complex application architectures with multiple containers running in a distributed environment. Gitblit, on the other hand, is more suited for managing code repositories and may not offer the same level of scalability for container orchestration.

In Summary, Docker Compose focuses on container deployment and orchestration, while Gitblit is more specialized in managing Git repositories with features like code reviews and pull requests.