StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Docker Compose vs GitLab

Docker Compose vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of software development, there are various tools available to streamline and manage the development process. Two popular tools in this space are Docker Compose and GitLab. While both tools provide benefits in different areas, they have distinct differences that set them apart.

  1. Orchestration vs Version Control: The key difference between Docker Compose and GitLab lies in their core functionalities. Docker Compose is primarily an orchestration tool that enables the management and deployment of containers in a distributed system. It allows developers to define and manage multiple services as a single application. On the other hand, GitLab is a version control platform that helps teams collaborate on code, manage repositories, and track changes over time. It focuses on providing a centralized platform for code versioning and branching, issue tracking, and continuous integration.

  2. Deployment vs Development Lifecycle: Another difference is seen in the stage of the development lifecycle where these tools are utilized. Docker Compose is used primarily in the deployment and containerization phase, where developers define the infrastructure as code and orchestrate containerized applications. Whereas, GitLab is more involved in the development phase, supporting version control, collaboration, and CI/CD pipeline automation.

  3. Infrastructure vs Application Configuration: Docker Compose mainly focuses on defining and managing the infrastructure needed to run applications. It enables developers to define networks, volumes, and services, configure resource limits, and establish inter-container communication. On the other hand, GitLab is more concerned with the application itself. It allows teams to collaborate on code, manage branches, perform code reviews, and track issues. Although GitLab also supports infrastructure as code capabilities, its primary focus is on the application's source code and its management.

  4. Stand-alone Tool vs Integrated Platform: Docker Compose is a stand-alone tool that integrates with Docker, enabling the management of containerized applications on a single host or across multiple hosts. It provides flexibility in choosing the infrastructure and tools around it. In contrast, GitLab is an integrated platform that encompasses various tools and functionalities. It offers a complete DevOps lifecycle solution, including version control, continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, and project management features.

  5. Scalability vs Collaboration: Docker Compose enables the management of containerized applications at scale, providing the ability to define and orchestrate multiple services. It focuses on orchestrating containers across distributed systems, allowing for scalability and ensuring applications can handle increased workloads. Conversely, GitLab focuses more on collaboration and team workflows. It provides features like code merge requests, code reviews, and issue tracking, enabling teams to collaborate efficiently and maintain code quality.

In summary, Docker Compose and GitLab have significant differences in their core functionalities, usage in different stages of the development lifecycle, focus on infrastructure or application configuration, being a stand-alone tool or an integrated platform, and prioritizing scalability or collaboration aspects of software development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Docker Compose

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
54.5K
Followers
16.5K
Votes
2.5K
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Docker Compose?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana