StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Load Balancer Reverse Proxy
  5. Docker Compose vs HAProxy

Docker Compose vs HAProxy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HAProxy
HAProxy
Stacks2.6K
Followers2.1K
Votes564
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs HAProxy: What are the differences?

  1. Orchestration Capability: Docker Compose is a tool used for defining and running multi-container Docker applications, while HAProxy is a high availability load balancer that distributes incoming traffic across multiple servers. Docker Compose focuses on container orchestration and deployment, while HAProxy is primarily designed for load balancing and ensuring high availability of services.

  2. Service Discovery: Docker Compose does not provide built-in service discovery features, whereas HAProxy offers service discovery capabilities by dynamically updating the backend server configuration based on the availability of services. This allows HAProxy to efficiently distribute traffic to healthy server instances.

  3. Scalability: Docker Compose is more suitable for small to medium-sized applications where scaling is not a primary concern, while HAProxy excels in managing the scalability of large distributed systems by efficiently load balancing traffic across multiple servers. HAProxy's ability to handle high volumes of traffic makes it a preferred choice for highly scalable applications.

  4. Monitoring and Logging: Docker Compose does not provide extensive monitoring and logging features out of the box, while HAProxy offers detailed logging and monitoring capabilities to track and analyze traffic patterns, identify performance bottlenecks, and troubleshoot issues in real-time. HAProxy's logging and monitoring functionalities enhance the visibility and control over the network traffic.

  5. Health Checks: Docker Compose does not offer built-in health checking mechanisms for containers, whereas HAProxy supports configurable health checks to monitor the status of backend servers and automatically remove or add servers from the load balancing pool based on their health. This proactive monitoring ensures high availability and reliability of services.

  6. High Availability: HAProxy is specifically designed for high availability scenarios, offering features like active-passive failover and seamless re-routing of traffic in case of server failures. In contrast, Docker Compose focuses more on simplifying the development and deployment of containerized applications rather than providing robust high availability mechanisms.

In Summary, Docker Compose and HAProxy serve different purposes in the realm of container orchestration and load balancing, with Docker Compose focusing on application deployment and orchestration, while HAProxy excels in load balancing, high availability, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HAProxy
HAProxy
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
2.6K
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
2.1K
Followers
16.5K
Votes
564
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 134
    Load balancer
  • 102
    High performance
  • 69
    Very fast
  • 58
    Proxying for tcp and http
  • 55
    SSL termination
Cons
  • 6
    Becomes your single point of failure
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to HAProxy, Docker Compose?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana