StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cluster Management
  5. Apache Mesos vs Docker Compose

Apache Mesos vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Stacks306
Followers418
Votes31
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.7K
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Apache Mesos vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to containerization and resource management, Apache Mesos and Docker Compose are two popular options. Both tools offer unique features and functionalities to simplify the deployment and management of applications. Understanding the key differences between Apache Mesos and Docker Compose is crucial for selecting the right tool for your specific requirements.

  1. Architecture: Apache Mesos is a distributed systems kernel that abstracts CPU, memory, storage, and other compute resources across a cluster of machines. It provides a unified interface for managing resources on a large scale, making it suitable for running distributed applications. On the other hand, Docker Compose is a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It is more focused on defining the services that make up an application and enabling easier communication between containers.

  2. Scope: Apache Mesos is designed for managing the resources of an entire data center, providing a platform for deploying and running large-scale distributed systems. It can handle complex workloads and scale to accommodate thousands of nodes. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is more suitable for developers working on smaller projects or testing environments where the focus is on defining and running interconnected containers locally or on a single host.

  3. Isolation: Apache Mesos provides strong isolation between tasks running on the same cluster by using Linux container technology. It ensures that tasks do not interfere with each other and are allocated the necessary resources based on defined constraints. Docker Compose, while utilizing Docker containers for isolation, does not offer the same level of resource isolation as Apache Mesos. It primarily focuses on defining and running containers in a more straightforward manner.

  4. Scaling: Apache Mesos has built-in support for scaling applications dynamically based on resource requirements. It can efficiently allocate resources to tasks and scale up or down as needed. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is more limited in terms of scaling capabilities. It is more suitable for defining the structure of an application rather than managing the scaling of containers in a distributed environment.

  5. Flexibility: Apache Mesos provides a flexible and extensible framework for building custom schedulers and frameworks to manage different types of workloads. It allows users to integrate with various services and technologies to create a tailored solution for their specific needs. Docker Compose, while providing a convenient way to define and run interconnected containers, is more limited in terms of extensibility and customization compared to Apache Mesos.

  6. Use Cases: Apache Mesos is well-suited for organizations with large scale distributed computing needs, such as data analytics, machine learning, or high-performance computing. It provides the infrastructure to efficiently utilize resources across a cluster of machines. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is more geared towards developers looking to streamline the development and testing of multi-container applications locally or in a small-scale environment.

Summary

In summary, Apache Mesos is a powerful resource management platform for distributed systems at a data center scale, offering advanced features such as strong isolation, dynamic scaling, and extensibility. On the other hand, Docker Compose is a more lightweight tool focused on defining and running interconnected containers for smaller-scale projects or development environments. Understanding the distinct architectures, scopes, isolation mechanisms, scaling capabilities, flexibility, and use cases of Apache Mesos and Docker Compose is essential for choosing the right tool for your specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Fault-tolerant replicated master using ZooKeeper;Scalability to 10,000s of nodes;Isolation between tasks with Linux Containers;Multi-resource scheduling (memory and CPU aware);Java, Python and C++ APIs for developing new parallel applications;Web UI for viewing cluster state
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
306
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
418
Followers
16.5K
Votes
31
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Easy scaling
  • 6
    Web UI
  • 2
    Fault-Tolerant
  • 1
    High-Available
  • 1
    Elastic Distributed System
Cons
  • 1
    Depends on Zookeeper
  • 1
    Not for long term
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Apache Mesos, Docker Compose?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Nomad

Nomad

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana