Docker Compose vs Netflix OSS

Overview

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Netflix OSS

Stacks76

Followers145

Votes0

Docker Compose vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of containerization and microservices architecture, Docker Compose and Netflix OSS are popular tools that serve different purposes in managing and scaling applications effectively.

Orchestration vs. Toolset: Docker Compose is primarily an orchestration tool for managing multiple containers within a single host, while Netflix OSS is a comprehensive toolset that includes various libraries and frameworks for building and managing microservices architecture across multiple hosts.
Container-based vs. Service-based: Docker Compose focuses on container-based deployment, where applications are containerized, while Netflix OSS emphasizes service-based architecture, where applications are broken down into loosely coupled services communicating over the network.
Simplicity vs. Extensibility: Docker Compose is known for its simplicity and ease of use in setting up development environments and deploying applications quickly, whereas Netflix OSS's extensive toolset offers a wide range of features for building robust and scalable microservices architectures, making it more complex but also more extensible.
Community vs. Enterprise Support: Docker Compose has a large community of developers contributing to its ecosystem and providing support, while Netflix OSS is backed by Netflix, a major player in the industry, offering enterprise-level support and resources for building and deploying microservices at scale.
Portability vs. Specialization: Docker Compose focuses on portability, allowing developers to package their applications with all dependencies, making it easier to deploy across different environments, whereas Netflix OSS is specialized in building fault-tolerant, high-performance microservices architectures tailored for cloud-based deployments.
Integration vs. Customization: Docker Compose integrates seamlessly with Docker Engine, providing a unified platform for managing containers, while Netflix OSS offers a range of tools that can be customized and integrated to meet specific requirements for building complex microservices architectures.

In Summary, Docker Compose simplifies container management for quick deployment, while Netflix OSS provides an extensive toolset for building highly scalable microservices architectures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose	Netflix OSS
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.	It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 36.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 22.3K	Stacks 76
Followers 16.5K	Followers 145
Votes 501	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Netflix OSS?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Docker Compose vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of containerization and microservices architecture, Docker Compose and Netflix OSS are popular tools that serve different purposes in managing and scaling applications effectively.

Orchestration vs. Toolset: Docker Compose is primarily an orchestration tool for managing multiple containers within a single host, while Netflix OSS is a comprehensive toolset that includes various libraries and frameworks for building and managing microservices architecture across multiple hosts.
Container-based vs. Service-based: Docker Compose focuses on container-based deployment, where applications are containerized, while Netflix OSS emphasizes service-based architecture, where applications are broken down into loosely coupled services communicating over the network.
Simplicity vs. Extensibility: Docker Compose is known for its simplicity and ease of use in setting up development environments and deploying applications quickly, whereas Netflix OSS's extensive toolset offers a wide range of features for building robust and scalable microservices architectures, making it more complex but also more extensible.
Community vs. Enterprise Support: Docker Compose has a large community of developers contributing to its ecosystem and providing support, while Netflix OSS is backed by Netflix, a major player in the industry, offering enterprise-level support and resources for building and deploying microservices at scale.
Portability vs. Specialization: Docker Compose focuses on portability, allowing developers to package their applications with all dependencies, making it easier to deploy across different environments, whereas Netflix OSS is specialized in building fault-tolerant, high-performance microservices architectures tailored for cloud-based deployments.
Integration vs. Customization: Docker Compose integrates seamlessly with Docker Engine, providing a unified platform for managing containers, while Netflix OSS offers a range of tools that can be customized and integrated to meet specific requirements for building complex microservices architectures.

In Summary, Docker Compose simplifies container management for quick deployment, while Netflix OSS provides an extensive toolset for building highly scalable microservices architectures.