StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cluster Management
  5. Docker Datacenter vs Mesosphere

Docker Datacenter vs Mesosphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mesosphere
Mesosphere
Stacks80
Followers108
Votes6
Docker Datacenter
Docker Datacenter
Stacks9
Followers33
Votes1

Docker Datacenter vs Mesosphere: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Docker Datacenter and Mesosphere are two popular container orchestration platforms used in the industry for managing and deploying applications. Despite serving similar purposes, they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Deployment Flexibility: Docker Datacenter is more focused on container management and deployment, providing a simpler and more streamlined approach to orchestrating containers. On the other hand, Mesosphere offers a broader range of deployment options by supporting various container orchestrators, making it more flexible for enterprises with diverse needs.

  2. Scalability: Mesosphere excels in scalability with its ability to manage thousands of nodes and containers across a distributed infrastructure. Docker Datacenter, although powerful, may face limitations in handling massive scale deployments compared to Mesosphere.

  3. Resource Utilization: Mesosphere provides more advanced resource utilization and optimization features by leveraging technologies like Apache Mesos, which enables efficient resource allocation and management. Docker Datacenter, while efficient, may not offer the same level of resource optimization capabilities.

  4. Built-in Networking and Storage: Mesosphere comes with built-in networking and storage solutions like DC/OS networking and DC/OS block storage, offering a more comprehensive platform for handling container networking and storage requirements. Docker Datacenter may require additional tools or configurations for advanced networking and storage capabilities.

  5. Multi-Cloud Support: Mesosphere has strong support for multi-cloud environments, allowing users to seamlessly deploy and manage applications across different cloud providers. Docker Datacenter, while compatible with multiple cloud platforms, may not have the same level of seamless integration across different clouds as Mesosphere.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Docker Datacenter benefits from a large and active community of users and developers, providing extensive support and resources for users. Mesosphere also has a vibrant community, but Docker Datacenter's ecosystem may offer more readily available plugins, tools, and integrations due to its widespread adoption in the containerization space.

In Summary, while Docker Datacenter and Mesosphere both offer container orchestration solutions, they distinguish themselves in deployment flexibility, scalability, resource utilization, networking and storage capabilities, multi-cloud support, and community ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mesosphere
Mesosphere
Docker Datacenter
Docker Datacenter

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

Docker Datacenter is an integrated solution including open source and commercial software, the integrations between them, full Docker API support, validated configurations and commercial support for your Docker Datacenter environment.

Built on top of open source technology;Grow to tens of thousands of nodes effortlessly while dynamically allocating resources with ease.;Mesosphere keeps your apps running by rebalancing resources and restarting failed tasks automatically.;Mesosphere packs each server with multiple apps, increasing resource utilization.;
-
Statistics
Stacks
80
Stacks
9
Followers
108
Followers
33
Votes
6
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Devops
Pros
  • 1
    Simple to use
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Docker
Docker
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Docker
Docker
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

What are some alternatives to Mesosphere, Docker Datacenter?

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

Nomad

Nomad

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana