Docker Machine vs Netflix OSS

Overview

Docker Machine

Stacks430

Followers518

Votes12

Netflix OSS

Stacks76

Followers145

Votes0

Docker Machine vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code presents the key differences between Docker Machine and Netflix OSS.

Installation Process: Docker Machine allows for a streamlined installation process by automating the setup of Docker engines on virtual hosts, whereas Netflix OSS focuses on providing a suite of tools for building and managing microservices architectures without directly handling the installation of Docker engines.
Scaling Capabilities: Docker Machine enables easy scalability by creating and managing multiple Docker hosts, while Netflix OSS emphasizes on scalability by offering tools like Eureka for service discovery and tracking changes in the network topology.
Resource Management: Docker Machine enables more granular control over resource allocation and utilization for Docker containers on different hosts, whereas Netflix OSS focuses on managing resources at a higher level through tools like Hystrix for fault tolerance and resilience.
Networking Functionality: Docker Machine simplifies networking configurations by providing default options for communication between containers on different hosts, whereas Netflix OSS offers tools like Zuul for routing and filtering HTTP requests in a microservices architecture.
Monitoring and Logging: Docker Machine offers basic monitoring capabilities for Docker hosts and containers, while Netflix OSS provides tools like Spectator for monitoring metrics and logging frameworks like Mantis for real-time analytics and visualization.
Service Discovery: Docker Machine relies on manual configuration for service discovery between Docker containers on different hosts, whereas Netflix OSS revolves around dynamic service discovery and registration using tools like Eureka and Ribbon.

In Summary, this Markdown code outlines the key differences between Docker Machine and Netflix OSS, including their approaches to installation, scaling, resource management, networking, monitoring, and service discovery in the context of building and managing microservices architectures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Machine	Netflix OSS
Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.	It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices.
Statistics
Stacks 430	Stacks 76
Followers 518	Followers 145
Votes 12	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Easy docker hosts management	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker Machine, Netflix OSS?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

Docker Machine vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code presents the key differences between Docker Machine and Netflix OSS.

Installation Process: Docker Machine allows for a streamlined installation process by automating the setup of Docker engines on virtual hosts, whereas Netflix OSS focuses on providing a suite of tools for building and managing microservices architectures without directly handling the installation of Docker engines.
Scaling Capabilities: Docker Machine enables easy scalability by creating and managing multiple Docker hosts, while Netflix OSS emphasizes on scalability by offering tools like Eureka for service discovery and tracking changes in the network topology.
Resource Management: Docker Machine enables more granular control over resource allocation and utilization for Docker containers on different hosts, whereas Netflix OSS focuses on managing resources at a higher level through tools like Hystrix for fault tolerance and resilience.
Networking Functionality: Docker Machine simplifies networking configurations by providing default options for communication between containers on different hosts, whereas Netflix OSS offers tools like Zuul for routing and filtering HTTP requests in a microservices architecture.
Monitoring and Logging: Docker Machine offers basic monitoring capabilities for Docker hosts and containers, while Netflix OSS provides tools like Spectator for monitoring metrics and logging frameworks like Mantis for real-time analytics and visualization.
Service Discovery: Docker Machine relies on manual configuration for service discovery between Docker containers on different hosts, whereas Netflix OSS revolves around dynamic service discovery and registration using tools like Eureka and Ribbon.

Docker Machine vs Netflix OSS

Overview

Docker Machine vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?