StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Machine vs Smith

Docker Machine vs Smith

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Stacks430
Followers518
Votes12
Smith
Smith
Stacks9
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars601
Forks36

Docker Machine vs Smith: What are the differences?

  1. Networking: Docker Machine allows you to create and manage multiple Docker hosts on local or cloud infrastructures, while Smith focuses on simplifying the process of managing Docker containers and services running on a single host.

  2. Scope: Docker Machine is more suitable for managing large-scale infrastructures with multiple hosts, while Smith is designed for smaller projects where a single Docker host suffices.

  3. Functionality: Docker Machine provides tools for creating, running, and managing Docker hosts on various environments, while Smith focuses on managing containers, services, and networks on a single host.

  4. User Interface: Docker Machine requires users to interact with the command line interface for managing Docker hosts, while Smith offers a graphical web-based interface for managing containers and services.

  5. Automation: Docker Machine supports automation and scripting for deploying Docker hosts, while Smith focuses on simplifying manual management tasks on a single host.

  6. Integration: Docker Machine integrates seamlessly with Docker Swarm for orchestration and scaling, while Smith focuses on providing a simple, user-friendly interface for managing Docker containers and services.

In Summary, Docker Machine is suited for managing multiple Docker hosts on various infrastructures, while Smith simplifies the management of containers and services on a single host.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Smith
Smith

Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.

smith is a simple command line utility for building microcontainers from rpm packages or oci images.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
601
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
36
Stacks
430
Stacks
9
Followers
518
Followers
11
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Easy docker hosts management
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Docker Machine, Smith?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana