Docker Swarm vs XMPP

Overview

Docker Swarm

Stacks779

Followers990

Votes282

XMPP

Stacks70

Followers138

Votes0

Docker Swarm vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Docker Swarm and XMPP are both technologies used in the world of IT but serve different purposes and operate in distinct ways.

Scalability: Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool that allows for the management of a cluster of Docker Engines, enabling the scaling of applications across multiple hosts. XMPP, on the other hand, is an open-source communication protocol used for instant messaging and presence tracking. It does not inherently offer the same scalability features as Docker Swarm for managing containers.
Use Case: Docker Swarm is primarily used for automating the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. It is focused on providing a reliable platform for running distributed applications at scale. XMPP, however, is designed for real-time communication and is commonly utilized in messaging applications and chat services. The use cases for Docker Swarm and XMPP are fundamentally distinct.
Technology Stack: Docker Swarm operates within the containerization technology ecosystem, working closely with Docker Engine and other related tools like Docker Compose. XMPP, on the other hand, is a standalone communication protocol that can be implemented in various programming languages and integrated into different types of applications and services. Their underlying technology stacks differ significantly.
Load Balancing: Docker Swarm includes built-in support for container load balancing, allowing for efficient distribution of traffic across containers in a cluster. XMPP, on the other hand, does not have native load balancing capabilities as it is primarily focused on message exchange between clients. Load balancing is a key difference in how these technologies handle traffic distribution.
Security Focus: Docker Swarm places a strong emphasis on security, offering features like secret management, role-based access control, and network encryption to safeguard containerized applications. XMPP also has security mechanisms in place, such as TLS encryption for message transmission, but the focus is primarily on securing communication channels, not containerized environments. Security priorities differ between Docker Swarm and XMPP.

In Summary, Docker Swarm and XMPP differ in terms of scalability, use case, technology stack, load balancing capabilities, and security focus, reflecting their distinct roles in container management and real-time communication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker Swarm, XMPP

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

Decidedon

GitHub

GitHub Pages

Markdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

@{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
@{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
@{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
@{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
@{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
@{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
@{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
@{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
@{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
@{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
@{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
@{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
@{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
@{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

12.8M views12.8M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker Swarm	XMPP
Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.	It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.
Statistics
Stacks 779	Stacks 70
Followers 990	Followers 138
Votes 282	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 55 Docker friendly 46 Easy to setup 40 Standard Docker API 38 Easy to use 23 Native Cons 9 Low adoption	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	Java Python JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm, XMPP?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Related Comparisons

Docker Swarm vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Docker Swarm and XMPP are both technologies used in the world of IT but serve different purposes and operate in distinct ways.

Scalability: Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool that allows for the management of a cluster of Docker Engines, enabling the scaling of applications across multiple hosts. XMPP, on the other hand, is an open-source communication protocol used for instant messaging and presence tracking. It does not inherently offer the same scalability features as Docker Swarm for managing containers.
Use Case: Docker Swarm is primarily used for automating the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. It is focused on providing a reliable platform for running distributed applications at scale. XMPP, however, is designed for real-time communication and is commonly utilized in messaging applications and chat services. The use cases for Docker Swarm and XMPP are fundamentally distinct.
Technology Stack: Docker Swarm operates within the containerization technology ecosystem, working closely with Docker Engine and other related tools like Docker Compose. XMPP, on the other hand, is a standalone communication protocol that can be implemented in various programming languages and integrated into different types of applications and services. Their underlying technology stacks differ significantly.
Load Balancing: Docker Swarm includes built-in support for container load balancing, allowing for efficient distribution of traffic across containers in a cluster. XMPP, on the other hand, does not have native load balancing capabilities as it is primarily focused on message exchange between clients. Load balancing is a key difference in how these technologies handle traffic distribution.
Security Focus: Docker Swarm places a strong emphasis on security, offering features like secret management, role-based access control, and network encryption to safeguard containerized applications. XMPP also has security mechanisms in place, such as TLS encryption for message transmission, but the focus is primarily on securing communication channels, not containerized environments. Security priorities differ between Docker Swarm and XMPP.

Docker Swarm vs XMPP

Overview