StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Dokku vs nginx

Dokku vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Dokku
Dokku
Stacks180
Followers216
Votes69
GitHub Stars31.4K
Forks2.0K

Dokku vs nginx: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Dokku and Nginx

Dokku and Nginx are both widely used technologies in the web development field. While Dokku is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution that allows developers to easily deploy and manage applications, Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, and HTTP cache. Although they have some overlapping features, there are several key differences between Dokku and Nginx.

1. Dokku's Full-Featured PaaS vs Nginx's Web Server Capabilities: Dokku provides a complete PaaS solution that not only handles the web server functionality but also automates the deployment and management of applications. On the other hand, Nginx primarily functions as a web server and requires additional tools and configurations to set up a complete PaaS environment.

2. Dokku's One-Click Deployments vs Nginx's Manual Configuration: With Dokku, developers can easily deploy their applications with a single command, making the process simple and efficient. In contrast, Nginx requires manual configuration and setup, involving tasks such as creating server blocks, configuring proxies, and managing SSL certificates.

3. Dokku's Automatic Scaling vs Nginx's Manual Scaling: Dokku provides automatic scaling capabilities, allowing applications to dynamically adjust their resource allocation based on demand. Nginx, on the other hand, requires manual intervention for scaling, requiring administrators to configure load balancing and distribute traffic across multiple servers.

4. Dokku's Built-in Plugins vs Nginx's Modularity: Dokku offers a variety of built-in plugins that extend its functionality and enable features such as database management, SSL certificate generation, and continuous deployment. In contrast, Nginx follows a modular approach, allowing administrators to add or remove specific modules based on their requirements.

5. Dokku's Git-Based Workflow vs Nginx's Static Configuration Files: Dokku follows a Git-based workflow, where developers can easily deploy their applications by pushing code to a remote repository. Changes in the codebase automatically trigger builds and deployments. In contrast, Nginx relies on static configuration files that need to be modified manually whenever changes are made.

6. Dokku's Simplicity vs Nginx's Flexibility: Dokku is designed to be simple and easy to use, providing a straightforward setup process and user-friendly commands. Nginx, on the other hand, offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing administrators to fine-tune various aspects of the web server's configuration.

In Summary, Dokku is a full-featured PaaS solution with easy deployments, automatic scaling, and built-in plugins, while Nginx is primarily a web server with more flexibility but requires manual configuration and lacks some of the automated features provided by Dokku.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Dokku

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Dokku
Dokku

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

-
Open source PAAS alternative to Heroku; No vendor lock-in; Getting started is extremely easy; Extensible & customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
31.4K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
180
Followers
61.9K
Followers
216
Votes
5.5K
Votes
69
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 23
    Simple
  • 12
    Open Source
  • 11
    Free
  • 11
    Built on Docker
  • 4
    Yay, it works like a charm
Integrations
No integrations available
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Semaphore
Semaphore
Drone.io
Drone.io
CloudBees
CloudBees
Arch Linux
Arch Linux
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Dokku?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase