StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. DokuWiki vs Typo3

DokuWiki vs Typo3

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Stacks72
Followers99
Votes0
Typo3
Typo3
Stacks130
Followers86
Votes50

DokuWiki vs Typo3: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax and Formatting: DokuWiki uses a simple syntax for creating and editing content, utilizing simple markup symbols. On the other hand, Typo3 offers a more complex system with Rich Text Editor (RTE) and drag-and-drop functionality for content creation.
  2. Purpose and Focus: DokuWiki is primarily a lightweight and easy-to-use wiki software focused on documentation and knowledge management. In contrast, Typo3 is a comprehensive content management system (CMS) designed for creating complex websites with various functionalities.
  3. User Base and Community: DokuWiki has a smaller user base and community compared to Typo3, which has a larger following and active community support for development and maintenance.
  4. Customization and Extensions: Typo3 provides extensive customization options and a wide range of extensions for adding additional features to websites. DokuWiki, although customizable, has a more limited selection of plugins and extensions.
  5. Learning Curve: DokuWiki's simple syntax and user-friendly interface make it easier for non-technical users to learn and use effectively, while Typo3's advanced features and complexity may require more technical expertise and training.
  6. Scalability and Performance: Due to its lightweight nature, DokuWiki is more lightweight and faster in performance for small to medium-sized websites, whereas Typo3 can handle larger and more complex websites with its robust architecture and scalability features.

In Summary, DokuWiki is a lightweight wiki software focused on simplicity and ease of use, while Typo3 is a comprehensive CMS with advanced functionalities and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Typo3
Typo3

It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Statistics
Stacks
72
Stacks
130
Followers
99
Followers
86
Votes
0
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Great Security
  • 6
    Enterprise CMS
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    LTS and ELTS
  • 4
    Customizable

What are some alternatives to DokuWiki, Typo3?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack