Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Drill vs Mandrill: What are the differences?
## Apache Drill vs. Mandrill
Apache Drill is an open-source software framework that supports data-intensive distributed applications for interactive analysis of large-scale datasets. Mandrill, on the other hand, is a transactional email API for Mailchimp users to send personalized and targeted emails to their subscribers.
1. **Use Case**: Apache Drill is primarily used for executing SQL queries on various data sources including Hadoop, NoSQL databases, and cloud storage systems, enabling users to analyze diverse datasets without the need for data movement or transformation. In contrast, Mandrill focuses on sending transactional emails such as order confirmations, password resets, and personalized marketing messages to users.
2. **Data Processing**: Apache Drill is designed for handling complex data processing tasks at scale, using a distributed architecture to efficiently process and query large datasets in real-time. Mandrill, however, is optimized for handling the sending of individual emails with personalized content and tracking the performance of email campaigns.
3. **Deployment**: Apache Drill can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, providing flexibility for organizations to scale their data processing capabilities based on their specific requirements and infrastructure. In contrast, Mandrill is a cloud-based service that handles all aspects of email delivery and management, simplifying the setup and configuration for users.
4. **Cost**: Apache Drill is an open-source project, which means it is free to use and customize for both personal and commercial purposes, lowering the barrier to entry for organizations looking to implement advanced data query capabilities. Mandrill, however, operates on a paid subscription model, where users pay based on the number of emails sent and additional features required for their email campaigns.
5. **Integration**: Apache Drill can integrate with a wide range of data sources and tools, making it versatile for data analysts and developers working with different types of datasets and technologies. Mandrill, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with the Mailchimp platform, allowing users to leverage email marketing features seamlessly within their Mailchimp account.
6. **Scalability**: Apache Drill is designed to scale horizontally, meaning it can easily handle increased workloads by adding more nodes to the cluster, providing high availability and performance for data processing tasks. In comparison, Mandrill's scalability is more focused on handling larger volumes of email traffic efficiently, ensuring reliable delivery and tracking of emails sent through the platform.
In Summary, Apache Drill is a data processing tool for analyzing large-scale datasets, while Mandrill is an email API service for sending personalized transactional emails.
For transactional emails, notifications, reminders, etc, I want to make it so writers/designers can set up the emails and maintain them, and then dynamically insert fields, that I then replace when actually sending the mail from code.
I think the ability to use a basic layout template across individual email templates would make things a lot easier (think header, footer, standard typography, etc).
What is best for this? Why would you prefer Mailgun, SendGrid, Mandrill or something else?
The only transactional email service that I've been able to stomach is Postmark! It is by far the easiest (and quickest to get feedback from) service that I have come across. While drowning in attempts to debug Mandril, Mailgun and others I get quick feedback from Postmark in what I need to do.
Postmark for the win!
If you need your emails to be sent in a time-sensitive manner, I'd recommend SendGrid. We were using Mailgun and the lag because they aren't "transactional" in nature caused issues for us. SendGrid also has the ability to do dynamic templates and bulk send from their API. I don't know that they have the shared layout ability you mentioned, though.
We are using more extensively Mandrill.
It is a ok tool, which gives you the power for emailing with nice set of features.
The templates editing and management is a bit tricky, but this is mostly related to email templates in general, which are hard to create and maintain.
I do not think you can share the parts of the templates. You can have your predefined templates with possibility to insert dynamic content.
They provide a limited possibility to preview and test your templates.
The template editor is text only. For the better editors checkout http://topol.io or https://mosaico.io
Unfortunately, I do not have experience with the other tools and possibilities to manage templates.
At this stage, all of the tools you mentioned do email delivery pretty well. They all support email templates as well. Here are some considerations:
- Twilio owns SendGrid. If you're an existing Twilio customer, in my opinion that's a good reason to use SendGrid over the other solutions. The APIs are solid, and Twilio has excellent developer tools that allow you to create interesting automations (which is important for scaling).
- Mandrill was created by MailChimp, who have massive experience with email delivery and specifically with emailing beautiful email templates.
- Mailgun is a tool on its own. Like the other two, it supports mail templates and is built to be controlled almost exclusively via APIs.
SendGrid and Mandrill have pretty nice WYSIWIG template editors as part of their platform. Not so sure about Mailgun.
So for me the considerations would be: 1. How easy is it for you to integrate with their API? How complete is their API in terms of your own specific needs? 2. Prices: Which one works best for my budget? 3. Am I OK with editing the templates elsewhere (or even by hand), and then pasting the code into Mailgun? Or do I want the comfort of Mandrill or Sendgrid with their WYSIWYG editors?
Personally I'd go with Twilio, simply because it's such a massive ecosystem they are less likely to go bankrupt, and their APIs are rock solid.
Pros of Apache Drill
- NoSQL and Hadoop4
- Free3
- Lightning speed and simplicity in face of data jungle3
- Well documented for fast install2
- SQL interface to multiple datasources1
- Nested Data support1
- Read Structured and unstructured data1
- V1.10 released - https://drill.apache.org/1
Pros of Mandrill
- Simple installation189
- Great api141
- Generous free allowance to get you started123
- Cheap and simple114
- Trackable99
- Well-documented59
- Doesn't go to spam54
- Great for mailchimp users47
- Webhooks32
- Client libraries28
- Heroku Add-on7
- Easy to use6
- Meaningful Metrics5
- Free5
- Advanced Tagging and Reports3
- Mobile Access3
- Status Update3
- Very chimp-like2
- Great Documentation2
- love this service2
- Free Plan1
- Webhooks for bounce mail1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Drill
Cons of Mandrill
- Really hard to pull analytics out via api1