StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. DVC vs Plastic SCM

DVC vs Plastic SCM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM
Stacks40
Followers75
Votes17
DVC
DVC
Stacks57
Followers91
Votes2
GitHub Stars15.1K
Forks1.3K

DVC vs Plastic SCM: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between DVC and Plastic SCM.

## 1. Scalability:
DVC is more suitable for smaller teams and projects due to its lightweight nature, while Plastic SCM is designed to handle larger teams and complex projects with its centralized version control system.

## 2. Versioning:
DVC focuses on data versioning in machine learning projects, allowing users to track changes to data files. On the other hand, Plastic SCM offers version control for both code and binary files, making it versatile for a wide range of projects.

## 3. File Locking:
Plastic SCM provides file-locking capabilities, which can be beneficial for teams working on the same files to avoid conflicts. DVC, however, does not offer file locking as it primarily focuses on data versioning in a collaborative environment.

## 4. Branching and Merging:
Plastic SCM offers robust branching and merging capabilities, making it a preferred choice for teams working on multiple features concurrently. DVC, on the other hand, has limited support for branching and merging, making it less suitable for complex development workflows.

## 5. GUI and User Interface:
Plastic SCM provides a comprehensive GUI with user-friendly features, making it easier for users to navigate and track changes. DVC, on the other hand, lacks a sophisticated GUI and relies more on command-line interfaces, which may be challenging for users unfamiliar with terminal-based tools.

## 6. Pricing Model:
DVC is open-source and free to use, making it cost-effective for small teams and individual developers. In contrast, Plastic SCM offers a commercial license with various pricing tiers based on the number of users and features required, making it more suitable for enterprise use with dedicated support and advanced features.

## Summary
In Summary, DVC and Plastic SCM differ in scalability, versioning support, file locking, branching and merging capabilities, user interface, and pricing model, catering to different project requirements and team sizes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM
DVC
DVC

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

Distributed version control system;Branch Explorer;Semantic Version Control;Locking;Huge files;Big projects;GitSync;Super strong merging;Partial replica;ACL security;Database backends
Git-compatible; Storage agnostic; Reproducible; Low friction branching; Metric tracking; ML pipeline framework; Language- & framework-agnostic; HDFS, Hive & Apache Spark; Track failures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
40
Stacks
57
Followers
75
Followers
91
Votes
17
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Wanna do Branch per Task Dev? Plastic rocks it
  • 4
    No Size limite
  • 2
    Simple, easy to use interfaces. Resilient and solid
  • 2
    File Locking
  • 1
    Very fast
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have file staging
  • 1
    No dark theme
  • 1
    Can't place windows next to each other to save space
  • 1
    Keyboard shortcuts are lacking
  • 1
    Adds files with only changed timestamp to pending
Pros
  • 2
    Full reproducibility
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't scale for big data
  • 1
    Requires working locally with the data
  • 1
    Coupling between orchestration and version control
Integrations
Gluon
Gluon
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jenkins
Jenkins
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Google Drive
Google Drive
PyTorch
PyTorch
Git
Git
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Python
Python
Julia
Julia
TensorFlow
TensorFlow

What are some alternatives to Plastic SCM, DVC?

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

Magit

Magit

It is an interface to the version control system Git, implemented as an Emacs package. It aspires to be a complete Git porcelain. While we cannot (yet) claim that it wraps and improves upon each and every Git command, it is complete enough to allow even experienced Git users to perform almost all of their daily version control tasks directly from within Emacs. While many fine Git clients exist, only deserve to be called porcelains.

Replicate

Replicate

It lets you run machine learning models with a few lines of code, without needing to understand how machine learning works.

isomorphic-git

isomorphic-git

It is a pure JavaScript reimplementation of git that works in both Node.js and browser JavaScript environments. It can read and write to git repositories, fetch from and push to git remotes (such as GitHub), all without any native C++ module dependencies.

Gitless

Gitless

Gitless is an experiment to see what happens if you put a simple veneer on an app that changes the underlying concepts. Because Gitless is implemented on top of Git (could be considered what Git pros call a "porcelain" of Git), you can always fall back on Git.

Git Reflow

Git Reflow

Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template.

BitKeeper

BitKeeper

BitKeeper is a fast, enterprise-ready, distributed SCM that scales up to very large projects and down to tiny ones.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana