StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. EMQ vs ejabberd

EMQ vs ejabberd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ejabberd
ejabberd
Stacks33
Followers48
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.5K
Forks1.5K
EMQX
EMQX
Stacks35
Followers109
Votes6
GitHub Stars15.4K
Forks2.4K

EMQ vs ejabberd: What are the differences?

Introduction

EMQ and ejabberd are both popular open-source MQTT and XMPP messaging servers that are commonly used for building scalable real-time messaging applications. While they share some similarities in terms of their core functionalities, there are several key differences between EMQ and ejabberd that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Scalability and Performance: EMQ is specifically designed to handle high volumes of concurrent connections and messages, making it well-suited for large-scale deployments. It utilizes a distributed cluster architecture, allowing it to scale horizontally across multiple nodes. On the other hand, ejabberd also supports clustering but is primarily focused on providing performance and scalability for XMPP-based applications.

  2. Protocols Supported: EMQ is primarily focused on supporting MQTT, a lightweight publish-subscribe messaging protocol that is widely used in IoT applications. However, it also provides support for MQTT-SN (MQTT for sensor networks) and CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol). In contrast, ejabberd is an XMPP server that supports the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol, an XML-based protocol for real-time communication.

  3. Ease of Use and Configuration: EMQ offers a user-friendly web-based management dashboard that simplifies the configuration and monitoring of the server. It provides a comprehensive set of configuration options and a graphical interface for managing users, topics, and ACL rules. On the other hand, ejabberd uses a configuration file-based approach, which may require more technical expertise for setup and administration.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: EMQ has a relatively smaller but active community of developers and users. It provides a range of plugins and extensions that can be used to extend its functionalities. In contrast, ejabberd has been around for a longer time and has a larger and more mature community. It offers a wide range of third-party integrations, libraries, tools, and extensions developed by its community.

  5. Languages and Platform Support: EMQ is implemented in Erlang and can run on various platforms, including Linux, Windows, macOS, and Docker. It also provides SDKs and client libraries in multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, C, and Node.js. On the other hand, ejabberd is also implemented in Erlang and supports various operating systems, including Linux, FreeBSD, macOS, Solaris, and Windows.

  6. Commercial Support and Enterprise Adoption: EMQ is backed by a commercial company that provides professional support and services for enterprise customers. It offers a commercial version of the server with additional features and enterprise-grade support. ejabberd, on the other hand, is maintained by a community-based open-source project and has a strong presence in the enterprise market, with several large-scale deployments in industries such as healthcare and finance.

In summary, EMQ is a highly scalable and performant MQTT messaging server with a user-friendly management dashboard, while ejabberd is a mature XMPP server that offers a wide range of integrations and has a strong enterprise presence. The choice between EMQ and ejabberd depends on the specific requirements of the application and the preferred messaging protocols.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ejabberd
ejabberd
EMQX
EMQX

It is a distributed, fault-tolerant technology that allows the creation of large-scale instant messaging applications. The server can reliably support thousands of simultaneous users on a single node and has been designed to provide exceptional standards of fault tolerance.

EMQX is a cloud-native, MQTT-based, IoT messaging platform designed for high reliability and massive scale. Licensed under the Apache Version 2.0, EMQX is 100% compliant with MQTT 5.0 and 3.x standard protocol specifications.

Cross-platform; Administrator-friendly; Internationalized; Fault-tolerant
Scale to 100 million concurrent MQTT connections with a single EMQX 5.0 cluster./Licensed under the Apache Version 2.0, 100% compliant with MQTT 5.0 and 3.x standard protocol specifications for better scalability, security, and reliability./Move and process millions of MQTT messages per second in a single broker./Guarantee sub-millisecond latency in message delivery with the soft real-time runtime./Achieve high availability and horizontal scalability with a masterless distributed architecture./Easy to deploy on-premises and in public clouds with Kubernetes Operator and Terraform.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.5K
GitHub Stars
15.4K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
Stacks
33
Stacks
35
Followers
48
Followers
109
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    QoS 2
  • 2
    Clusters
  • 1
    Plugins
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Linux
Linux
MySQL
MySQL
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Linux
Linux
Cassandra
Cassandra
Kafka
Kafka
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to ejabberd, EMQX?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase