Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ELK

844
919
+ 1
21
Graylog

608
704
+ 1
70
Add tool

ELK vs Graylog: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of log management and analytics, ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana) and Graylog are two widely used platforms. Understanding the key differences between ELK and Graylog can help organizations make informed decisions when choosing a log management solution.

  1. Data Collection: One key difference between ELK and Graylog lies in data collection. ELK utilizes Logstash for log ingestion, which makes it highly flexible for parsing and enriching data from various sources. On the other hand, Graylog has its data collection agent called Graylog Collector Sidecar, which simplifies the process of sending logs to Graylog.

  2. Search Capabilities: Another crucial difference is in the search capabilities of ELK and Graylog. Elasticsearch, the core component of ELK, is known for its powerful and fast full-text search engine. This makes ELK particularly suitable for organizations dealing with complex search queries and large volumes of log data. Graylog, while also utilizing Elasticsearch, focuses more on structured data and offers a user-friendly search interface geared towards log analysis and monitoring.

  3. Alerting and Dashboards: ELK and Graylog differ significantly in their approach to creating alerts and dashboards. ELK provides basic monitoring and alerting functionalities through features like Elasticsearch Watcher, which require additional setup and configuration. In contrast, Graylog offers a built-in alerting system and customizable dashboards out of the box, making it more user-friendly for users who prioritize ease of use.

  4. Community Support: The level of community support is another differentiating factor between ELK and Graylog. ELK, being an open-source project with a large community of users and contributors, benefits from a wealth of community-created plugins, integrations, and resources. Graylog, while also open-source, has a slightly smaller community but offers professional support options for organizations requiring dedicated assistance.

  5. Scalability and Performance: ELK and Graylog vary in their scalability and performance characteristics. ELK, particularly Elasticsearch, is known for its scalability and ability to handle massive data volumes efficiently. Organizations dealing with high-volume logs may find ELK more suitable due to its robust scalability features. Graylog, while scalable, may require additional configuration and optimizations to handle large-scale log data effectively.

  6. User Interface: A notable difference between ELK and Graylog is in their user interface design and usability. Kibana, the visualization component of ELK, offers a more customizable and sophisticated user interface for creating visualizations and dashboards. Graylog, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more intuitive interface that caters to users looking for a straightforward log analysis experience without the need for extensive customization.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between ELK and Graylog in areas such as data collection, search capabilities, alerting and dashboards, community support, scalability and performance, and user interface can help organizations make informed decisions when selecting a log management platform.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of ELK
Pros of Graylog
  • 13
    Open source
  • 3
    Can run locally
  • 3
    Good for startups with monetary limitations
  • 1
    External Network Goes Down You Aren't Without Logging
  • 1
    Easy to setup
  • 0
    Json log supprt
  • 0
    Live logging
  • 19
    Open source
  • 13
    Powerfull
  • 8
    Well documented
  • 6
    Alerts
  • 5
    User authentification
  • 5
    Flexibel query and parsing language
  • 3
    User management
  • 3
    Easy query language and english parsing
  • 3
    Alerts and dashboards
  • 2
    Easy to install
  • 1
    A large community
  • 1
    Manage users and permissions
  • 1
    Free Version

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of ELK
Cons of Graylog
  • 5
    Elastic Search is a resource hog
  • 3
    Logstash configuration is a pain
  • 1
    Bad for startups with personal limitations
  • 1
    Does not handle frozen indices at all

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is ELK?

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

What is Graylog?

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use ELK?
What companies use Graylog?
See which teams inside your own company are using ELK or Graylog.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with ELK?
What tools integrate with Graylog?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
53
21803
What are some alternatives to ELK and Graylog?
Datadog
Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
Splunk
It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.
Logstash
Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.
Logback
It is intended as a successor to the popular log4j project. It is divided into three modules, logback-core, logback-classic and logback-access. The logback-core module lays the groundwork for the other two modules, logback-classic natively implements the SLF4J API so that you can readily switch back and forth between logback and other logging frameworks and logback-access module integrates with Servlet containers, such as Tomcat and Jetty, to provide HTTP-access log functionality.
SLF4J
It is a simple Logging Facade for Java (SLF4J) serves as a simple facade or abstraction for various logging frameworks allowing the end user to plug in the desired logging framework at deployment time.
See all alternatives