1. Deployment Method: Empire deploys applications using Docker containers, while octohost provides a platform for deploying applications directly from a Git repository. Empire focuses on containerization, allowing for easier scalability and management, while octohost streamlines the deployment process by directly pulling source code from a Git repository.

2. Supported Languages: Empire supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks due to its use of Docker containers, enabling developers to work with their preferred technologies. On the other hand, octohost primarily supports languages and frameworks that can run on Unix-based systems, limiting the options available for developers. This difference in language support can impact the flexibility and compatibility of applications deployed on these platforms.

3. Scalability: Empire offers better scalability options compared to octohost, as Docker containers can be easily scaled horizontally to handle increased traffic and workload demands. Octohost, while capable of handling deployments, may require additional configuration or setup to achieve the same level of scalability as Empire. The scalability differences between the two platforms can influence the performance and responsiveness of applications under varying loads.

4. Administration and Maintenance: Empire requires a higher level of administration and maintenance compared to octohost due to the complexity of managing Docker containers and orchestrating deployments. Octohost simplifies administration and maintenance tasks by automating deployment processes directly from a Git repository, reducing the need for manual intervention. The difference in administration and maintenance effort can impact the resources and expertise required to manage applications on these platforms effectively.

5. Community Support: Empire benefits from a larger and more active community compared to octohost, providing developers with access to a diverse range of resources, tools, and support. Octohost, while still supported by a community of users, may have fewer resources and documentation available for troubleshooting and problem-solving. The difference in community support can affect the ease of development, troubleshooting, and adoption of these platforms by developers.

In Summary, Empire and octohost differ in their deployment methods, supported languages, scalability options, administration and maintenance requirements, and community support, impacting the overall development and management experience for applications deployed on these platforms.