Entity Signal vs SignalR

Overview

SignalR

Stacks656

Followers1.2K

Votes146

GitHub Stars9.3K

Forks2.3K

Entity Signal

Stacks1

Followers7

Votes0

GitHub Stars216

Forks23

Entity Signal vs SignalR: What are the differences?

Introduction: Entity Signal and SignalR are both technologies used for real-time communication in web applications. Although they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways.

Architecture: Entity Signal is based on the Entity Framework and provides real-time communication by directly notifying clients of database changes. In contrast, SignalR is a library that simplifies real-time web functionality by handling communication between the server and clients using WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, or other transport mechanisms.
Scalability: Entity Signal is more suited for applications where real-time updates are needed for specific entities in the database as it directly monitors database changes. On the other hand, SignalR is more versatile and scalable as it can be used in a variety of scenarios beyond database updates, making it suitable for a wider range of real-time communication needs.
Client Support: Entity Signal primarily focuses on notifying clients of changes related to entities in the database, making it more targeted towards data-specific applications. In contrast, SignalR provides a broader range of real-time communication features, including broadcasting messages to multiple clients, making it more suitable for applications requiring group communication.
Ease of Implementation: Entity Signal requires integration with the Entity Framework and configuration of real-time monitoring for specific entities, which may require more setup and customization. SignalR, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more straightforward implementation for real-time communication in web applications, making it easier to get started with.
Transport Mechanisms: Entity Signal relies on database triggers and change tracking mechanisms to detect and notify clients of database changes, which may result in more direct and efficient communication for data-specific applications. SignalR, on the other hand, supports various transport mechanisms such as WebSockets, Long Polling, and Server-Sent Events, providing more flexibility in communication protocols.
Cross-Platform Support: SignalR has better cross-platform support as it can be used in both .NET and JavaScript applications, making it a more versatile choice for building real-time web applications that work across different technologies and platforms.

In Summary, Entity Signal focuses on real-time database updates for specific entities, while SignalR provides a more versatile and scalable solution for real-time communication in web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SignalR	Entity Signal
SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.	It allows you to connect to Entity Framework through SignalR and get updates on subscribed data in real time. This lowers the number of refreshes done by the user and ultimately allows you to do more with fewer servers.
-	realtime backend, realtime frontend, realtime, websocket, realtime data
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.3K	GitHub Stars 216
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 23
Stacks 656	Stacks 1
Followers 1.2K	Followers 7
Votes 146	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 32 Supports .NET server 25 Real-time 18 Free 16 Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling 15 WebSockets Cons 2 Requires jQuery 2 Expertise hard to get 1 Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions 1 Weak iOS and Android support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET	React Vue.js AngularJS Vanilla.JS

What are some alternatives to SignalR, Entity Signal?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Entity Signal vs SignalR: What are the differences?

Architecture: Entity Signal is based on the Entity Framework and provides real-time communication by directly notifying clients of database changes. In contrast, SignalR is a library that simplifies real-time web functionality by handling communication between the server and clients using WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, or other transport mechanisms.
Scalability: Entity Signal is more suited for applications where real-time updates are needed for specific entities in the database as it directly monitors database changes. On the other hand, SignalR is more versatile and scalable as it can be used in a variety of scenarios beyond database updates, making it suitable for a wider range of real-time communication needs.
Client Support: Entity Signal primarily focuses on notifying clients of changes related to entities in the database, making it more targeted towards data-specific applications. In contrast, SignalR provides a broader range of real-time communication features, including broadcasting messages to multiple clients, making it more suitable for applications requiring group communication.
Ease of Implementation: Entity Signal requires integration with the Entity Framework and configuration of real-time monitoring for specific entities, which may require more setup and customization. SignalR, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more straightforward implementation for real-time communication in web applications, making it easier to get started with.
Transport Mechanisms: Entity Signal relies on database triggers and change tracking mechanisms to detect and notify clients of database changes, which may result in more direct and efficient communication for data-specific applications. SignalR, on the other hand, supports various transport mechanisms such as WebSockets, Long Polling, and Server-Sent Events, providing more flexibility in communication protocols.
Cross-Platform Support: SignalR has better cross-platform support as it can be used in both .NET and JavaScript applications, making it a more versatile choice for building real-time web applications that work across different technologies and platforms.

In Summary, Entity Signal focuses on real-time database updates for specific entities, while SignalR provides a more versatile and scalable solution for real-time communication in web applications.

Entity Signal vs SignalR

Overview